Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rotary International District 5390

Rotary district 5390 uses it resources to assist the montana rotary clubs build vibrant and prosperous communities in our state and world

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$68kYouth Development$45kInternational$29kEducation$20kPhilanthropy$15kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$12kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $46,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,071 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,071 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$6,000
Median grant
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rotary Club of Bozeman Sunrise$16,000
Rotary Club of Evergreen$6,000
Missoula Sunrise Rotary Club$6,000
District 5390 Youth Exchange$6,000
Rotary Club of Bozeman Noon$6,000
Rotary Club of Big Sky$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROTARY CLUB OF WHITEHALL: $3k → 8%ROTARY CLUB OF TOWNSEND: $2k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF RED LODGE: $3k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF LIVINGSTON: $3k → 10%ROTARY CLUB OF MILES CITY: $3k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF EVERGREEN: $3k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF HAMILTON: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF ANACONDA: $3k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF KOOTENAI VALLEY: $4k → 17%ROTARY CLUB OF BIGFORK: $2k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF TOWNSEND: $1k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF RED LODGE: $2k → 9%ROTARY CLUB OF EVERGREEN: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF ANACONDA: $2k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF KOOTENAI VALLEY: $3k → 17%ROTARY CLUB OF BIGFORK: $2k → 18%ROTARY CLUB OF WHITEFISH: $4k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF KOOTENAI VALLEY: $2k → 17%ROTARY CLUB OF WHITEFISH: $2k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBIA FALLS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Rotary International District 5390’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Rotary International District 5390lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$153k · 14 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$153k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

43%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’25
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $33k · revenue -59%
  • BS
    BOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB
    3× · 2020–2022 · $22k · revenue -64%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $22k · revenue 0% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • GF
    GREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -69%
  • RD
    ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Service club

2
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

3
Rotary International

Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…

4
River Falls Rotary Club

Community/World Service

5
Rotary International Yuma Foothills Rotary

To provide service to others, promote high ethical standards, and to advance world understanding, goodwill and peace.

6
Rotary International Walla Walla Sunrise Rotary Club

Public Service. Rotarians are involved in community service and other activities to benefit the community and youth.

7
Rotary International Dublin Am Rotary Club

Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.

8
Rotary International Boone Rotary Club

Community service club that provides educational & charitable assistance to boone county, iowa.

9
Rotary International

The object of the rotary is to encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

10
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

11
Rotary International - Souderton-Telford

A service org. that contrib. to the community & provides volunteer services.

12
Rotary International Ipswich Rotary Club

Promote social welfare

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary International Billings Rotary and the most unlike its peers is Libby Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB — $22,440 · OtherBOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUBROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL — $22,396 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELLRotary Club of Bozeman Sunrise — $16,000 · OtherRotary Club of Bozeman SunriseHELENA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $15,300 · OtherHELENA ROTARY FOUNDATION INCROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARY — $13,125 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARYROTARY CLUB OF BUTTE MONTANA USA — $8,610 · OtherLIBBY ROTARY CLUB — $8,000 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL WHITEFISH ROTARY CLUB — $6,107 · OtherMissoula Sunrise Rotary Club — $6,000 · OtherRotary Club of Big Sky — $6,000 · OtherRotary Club of Evergreen — $6,000 · OtherRotary Club of Bozeman Noon — $6,000 · OtherDistrict 5390 Youth Exchange — $6,000 · Other+11 more — $34,526 · Other+11 moreROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION — $33,449 · PhilanthropyROTARY DISTRICT 5…GREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $5,940 · Youth DevelopmentROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM — $4,000 · EducationTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $524 · International
Other$176,504Philanthropy$33,449Youth Development$5,940Education$4,000International$524

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION — $33,449 over 2y, 20% of budgetBOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB — $22,440 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL — $22,396 over 3y, 59% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARY — $13,125 over 3y, 18% of budgetGREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $5,940 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM — $4,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $2,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $524 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOZEMAN SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF KALISPELL
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL BILLINGS ROTARY
  • Who funds LIBBY ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL WHITEFISH ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds GREAT FALLS ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 5390 YOUTH EXCHANGE PROGRAM
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rotary International District 5390 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph