Skip to content

· Public charity

Rotary International Aspen Rotary Club

Community and international service.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$251kYouth Development$115kEducation$84kRecreation & Sports$51kInternational$15kPublic Benefit$10kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $37,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $260,906 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $223,406 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$37,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS$37,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $6k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%CORNELL COLLEGE: $6k → 9%TONAQUINT DATA CENTER- DAN STROBELL: $5k → 10%SILVER CITY GYMNASTICS: $10k → 6%ROTARY CLUB OF EDWARDS: $10k → 7%TRF DONAR ADVISED FUND: $10k → 10%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $6k → 12%THE GUATEMALA LITERACY PROJECT: $15k → 16%SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%CORNELL COLLEGE: $6k → 9%YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS: $83k → 6%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $54k → 6%OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $51k → 6%OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $38k → 6%ASPEN VALLEY SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB: $33k → 6%OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $29k → 6%OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $28k → 6%OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $26k → 6%ASPEN SISTER CITIES YOUTH: $21k → 6%THE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $16k → 6%ASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY: $11k → 6%ASPEN SKATING CLUB: $8k → 6%VARIOUS US COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES: $7k → 6%VARIOUS US COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 5 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

$270k
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +39%
  • CC
    CORNELL COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +39%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • YO
    YOUTH ORGANIZATIONS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $83k
  • AV
    ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +84%
  • AS
    ASPEN SISTER CITIES PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
3
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
7
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
9
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
10
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
11
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Aspen Junior Hockey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS: $225,250 · OtherOTHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSYOUTH ORGANIZATIONS: $82,732 · OtherYOUTH ORGANIZATIONSASPEN ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $15,920 · Other+10 more: $79,122 · Other+10 moreCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $15,000 · EducationCOOPERATIVE F…PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $12,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOA…CORNELL COLLEGE: $12,000 · EducationCORNELL COLLE…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UN…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…The George Washington University: $6,000 · EducationThe George Wa…ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $32,830 · Recreation & SportsASPEN SISTER CITIES PROGRAM INC: $20,961 · Community ImprovementASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $11,448 · Arts & Culture
Other$403,024Education$63,000Recreation & Sports$32,830Community Improvement$20,961Arts & Culture$11,448

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $32,830 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $11,448 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN SISTER CITIES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CORNELL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International Aspen Rotary Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International Aspen Rotary Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International Aspen Rotary Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph