Skip to content

· Public charity

Rotary Club of Reno Central Charitable Foundation

To administer funds contributed to service various community beneficiaries.

$52k
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Education$121kHealth$57kPhilanthropy$50kInternational$41kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$51,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL OF RENO CENTRAL$51,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $17k → 14%NOTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN CANCER: $50k → 10%ONE LEG UP ON LIFE: $8k → 13%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%RENO SOUTH ROTARY COMMUNITY FUND: $5k → 10%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%NORTHERN NEVADA HOPES: $44k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN: $36k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN: $25k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NEVADA: $23k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NEVADA: $15k → 10%NORTHERN NEVADA HOPES: $5k → 10%BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $18k → 10%BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $5k → 10%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL OF RENO CENTRAL: $52k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
3
Nevada Veterans Coalition

We support northern nevada veterans cemetery

—
4
Rotary International Las Vegas

The purpose of the Organization is to bring together business and professional leaders to provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help goodwill and peace in the world.

—
5
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
6
Renown Medical School Associates North Inc

Established in 1864 as Nevada's first hospital, we proudly serve our community as the only not-for-profit academic health system, committed to saving lives, nurturing minds and caring for all people.

Health
7
Las Vegas Northwest Rotary Foundation

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

Philanthropy
8
Nevada Scottish Rite Foundation
Membership Benefit
9
Nevada State Eb-5 Regional Center Inc
—
10
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
11
Educate Nevada Now

Educate Nevada Now (ENN) is a non-partisan education policy organization focused on ensuring that every Nevada child has access to a quality education, regardless of their family income or circumstances. ENN strives to make fair and…

—
12
Community Services of Nevada

CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Nevada Children's Cancer Foundation; the most unlike its peers is One Leg Up On Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Foundation of Northern Nevada: $97,770 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Northern NevadaNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATIONROTARY INTERNATIONAL OF RENO CENTRAL: $51,600 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIO…Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services: $49,503 · HealthNorthern Nevada H…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $40,541 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUND…ONE LEG UP ON LIFE: $7,500 · InternationalONE LEG UP ON LI…OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE NEVADA: $23,291 · EducationReno South Rotary Community Fund: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$147,770Other$51,600Health$49,503International$48,041Education$23,291Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $97,770 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services: $49,503 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $40,541 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE NEVADA: $23,291 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetONE LEG UP ON LIFE: $7,500 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary Club of Reno Central Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary Club of Reno Central Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rotary Club of Reno Central Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rotary Club of Reno Central Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of Reno Central’s filings →

    More from the funding graph