Skip to content
Rotary Club of Cadillac Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rotary Club of Cadillac Foundation

The organization is organized for charitable, educational & scientific purposes.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$73kPublic Benefit$60kHuman Services$40kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$25kArts & Culture$20kEducation$17kEnvironment$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALING PRIVATE WOUNDS$25,000
FRIENDS OF MANTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
3 ORGANIZATIONS$7,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LOVE INC: $20k → 13%CADILLAC AREA OASIS: $10k → 13%VETERANS SERVING VETERANS: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cadillac Area Land Conservancy

To protect ecologically significant scenic and farm lands for current and future generations, and to foster an appreciation of the natural environment in missaukee, osceola, wexford, and northern lake and mason counties.

Environment
2
Haven Homes of Detroit

To provide safe and stable housing for women in and around the city of detroit.

Human Services
3
Huron County Coalition Against Domestic Abuse

To aid victims of domestic abuse in transitioning to a life without the abuser through assistance with living expenses.

Human Services
4
Family Shelter of Mcculloch Co

The mission of the haven is to reduce the incidence and the impact of domestic violence and/or sexual assault in mcculloch, mason, menard kimble, and concho and surroundings areas by providing services a

Human Services
5
Military Order of the Purple Heart Service and Rehabilitation Office

To provide assistance to veterans living in michigan.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of Dekalb County

The mission is to unite people to provide decent and affordable housing for families in need

—
7
Severe Weather Network Livingston County

The Severe Weather Network (SWN) partners with community organizations, agencies, and faith communities to provide emergency, overnight refuge during the winter months for people experiencing homelessness in Livingston County. SWN also…

—
8
Montmorency County Habitat for Humanity

Repair, reconstruct, and build homes for persons in need of decent housing in montmorency county, mi

—
9
Hospitality in the Name of Christ

To provide a Mens emergency homeless shelter in Ludington Michigan

Housing & Shelter
10
Cass Lake Area Food Shelf

Our mission is to serve all people, working together to access needed food

Food & Nutrition
11
Down North Foundation

We believe change is rooted in community and requires imagination and reconstruction.

Community Improvement
12
Pontiac Free Library Association

To operate a free library for public use.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cadillac Area Habitat for Humanity; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Manton Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CADILLAC: $55,000 · OtherCITY OF CADILLACVIKING SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $23,400 · OtherVIKING SOFTBALL ASSOCIATIONWEXFORD COUNTY: $12,500 · OtherWEXFORD COUNTYFRIENDS OF MACKENZIE TRAIL: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MACKENZIE TRAILIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCADILLAC AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · OtherCADILLAC AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYN MI MTN BIKE ASSN: $10,000 · OtherN MI MTN BIKE ASSN3 ORGANIZATIONS: $7,400 · Other+6 more: $11,000 · Other+6 moreLOVE INC OF WEXFORD AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES: $20,000 · Human ServicesLOVE INC OF WEXFORD…Northern Michigan Mountain Bike Asn: $10,000 · Human ServicesNorthern Michigan M…VETERANS SERVING VETERANS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS SERVING VE…CADILLAC AREA OASISFAMILY RESOURCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesCADILLAC AREA OASIS…CADILLAC AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,500 · PhilanthropyCADILLAC AREA …HEALING PRIVATE WOUNDS: $25,000 · HealthHEALING P…UP NORTH ARTS INC: $19,995 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE MANTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · Education
Other$149,300Human Services$50,000Philanthropy$37,500Health$25,000Arts & Culture$19,995Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCADILLAC AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHEALING PRIVATE WOUNDS: $25,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetLOVE INC OF WEXFORD AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES: $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetUP NORTH ARTS INC: $19,995 over 1y, 20% of budgetNorthern Michigan Mountain Bike Asn: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetVETERANS SERVING VETERANS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCADILLAC AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCADILLAC AREA OASISFAMILY RESOURCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cadillac Area Communi…Consumers Energy Foun…Amazonsmile Foundation
Cadillac Area Community FoundationMI26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cadillac Area Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary Club of Cadillac Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary Club of Cadillac Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of Cadillac’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home