Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ross and Carol y Castro Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$27kHuman Services$24kCommunity Improvement$18kHousing & Shelter$16kPhilanthropy$12kArts & Culture$10kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$337k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SICILIAN SISTERHOOD$6,000
KQED$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$2,000
AIUTO FOUNDATION$2,000
HEART OF THE VALLEY$1,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$1,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$1,000
SAN JOSE DAY NURSERY$1,000
LUCILEPACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILD$1,000
TERRACES OF LOS GATOS - RESIDENT$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUMAN GOOD FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%CCV FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%CCV FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
NE
MO
VA
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 22 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$125k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+716%

Still filing today

36%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AIUTO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +121%
  • SJ
    SAN JOSE DAY NURSERY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +27%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • TO
    TERRACES OF LOS GATOS - ROBERT FOST
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • HF
    HUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
5
Cal Med Foundation
Education
6
Stanford Health Care
Health
7
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
8
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
9
Wt Stanford Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Johnson & Johnson Foundation United States Inc
—
11
Memorial Hospital Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

—
12
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health; the most unlike its peers is Aiuto Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SICILIAN SISTERHOOD: $17,500 · OtherSICILIAN SISTERHOODTERRACES OF LOS GATOS - RESIDENT: $15,380 · OtherTERRACES OF LOS GATOS - RESIDENTTERRACES OF LOS GATOS - ROBERT FOST: $10,250 · OtherTERRACES OF LOS GATOS - ROBERT FOSTSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $9,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKSALVATION ARMY: $7,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSAN JOSE DAY NURSERY: $7,500 · OtherSAN JOSE DAY NURSERYSONS OF SICILY AIUTO FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherSONS OF SICILY AIUTO FOUNDATIONHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6,500 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE VALLEYSUSAN GKOMEN BREAST CANCER: $4,500 · OtherHEART OF THE VALLEY CORP: $4,000 · Other+12 more: $15,900 · Other+12 moreLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $7,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,370 · HealthKQED INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAIUTO FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyHG FOUNDATION: $700 · PhilanthropyCCV FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesHUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA INC: $300 · Environment
Other$105,530Health$10,870Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$8,700Human Services$4,000Education$1,000Environment$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKQED INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAIUTO FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE DAY NURSERY: $7,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF THE VALLEY CORP: $4,000 over 3y, 93% of budgetCCV FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHG FOUNDATION: $700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds AIUTO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE DAY NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF THE VALLEY CORP ↗
  • Who funds CCV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST ↗
  • Who funds HG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ross and Carol y Castro Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ross and Carol y Castro Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ross and Carol y Castro Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ross and Carol y Castro Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ross and Carol y Castro’s filings →

    More from the funding graph