Skip to content
Roslyn and Joseph Baim Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Roslyn and Joseph Baim Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Health$1.7MPhilanthropy$275kReligion$254kEducation$150kPublic Safety & Disaster$150kCivil Rights$103kEnvironment$100kHuman Services$50kOther$0
02FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$152,114
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$150,000
THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION$150,000
CONGREGATION OR AMI$149,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$124,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$105,000
YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY$100,000
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$100,000
CITY OF HOPE$100,000
ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY$75,000
ALZHEIMER'S LOS ANGELES$75,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$65,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$50,000
JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LOS ANGELES (VALLEY ALLIANCE)$50,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $100 → 9%ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $75k → 10%YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 10%THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $150k → 11%CONCERN FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $1.1M → 14%ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY: $100k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $150k → 14%CAMERA: $500 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIORS: $100 → 18%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $105k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $250 → 13%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $152k → 14%CONGREGATION B'NAI ISREAL: $95k → 10%CONCERN FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%AIPAC: $2k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $100k → 14%CONGREGATION B'NAI ISREAL: $5k → 10%CONGREGATION OR AMI: $149k → 14%CONGREGATION OR AMI: $5k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $100k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LOS ANGELES (VALLEY ALLIANCE): $50k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $1k → 14%RESCUE ME CORPORATION: $18k → 14%WEST VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 14%WEST VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $150 → 14%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $500 → 14%FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $100k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $500 → 14%LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $25k → 14%ALZHEIMER'S LOS ANGELES: $75k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $65k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $15k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $124k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $180 → 14%FOXY AND THE HOUNDS: $18k → 14%CHILDRENS'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $96 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$938k · 8 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$938k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+13%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $640k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $252k · revenue +13%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $105k · revenue +78%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $101k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • CF
    CONCERN FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH
    one grant, 2021 · $1.1M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CH
    CHILDRENS'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
10
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
11
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foxy and the Hounds. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCERN FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $1,054,064 · OtherCONCERN FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCHCONGREGATION OR AMI: $154,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OR AMIJEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $124,276 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDCITY OF HOPE: $100,500 · OtherCITY OF HOPEIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $100,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL+9 more: $163,250 · Other+9 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $252,114 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $105,100 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RES…ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $75,000 · HealthALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS…ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $75,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COU…American Heart Association Inc: $65,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Associa…+2 more: $350 · HealthTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $150,000 · InternationalSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $101,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsRESCUE ME INC: $17,500 · AnimalsFOXY AND THE HOUNDS: $17,500 · AnimalsCONCERN FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,796,090Health$572,564Education$150,000International$150,000Arts & Culture$101,500Recreation & Sports$100,000Animals$35,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $252,114 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $105,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $101,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE ME INC: $17,500 over 1y, 37% of budgetFOXY AND THE HOUNDS: $17,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roslyn and Joseph Baim Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roslyn and Joseph Baim Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roslyn and Joseph Baim Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home