· Private foundation
Rosenberg Family Foundation Trust
Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k22 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $13,000 |
| LEZION BRINA INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| YOUNG ISRAEL OF WOODMERE | $4,983 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| NOAM SHABBOS ASSOCIATION | $1,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,113 |
| KULANU | $750 |
| ISRAEL PURIM FUND | $750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $540 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC | $500 |
| YESHIVA DIVREI CHAIM | $460 |
| VARIOUS | $400 |
| YERUHAM CENTER FOR TORAH EDUCATION | $400 |
| HALB | $360 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 80% of grant dollars ($76k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($19k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 20% of all-years giving ($19k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2017–2019 · $30k
- LBLEZION BRINA INSTITUTE3× · 2017–2019 · $19k
- NCNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL3× · 2017–2019 · $10k
Funded once
- CKCONG KAHAL YIREI HASHEMone grant, 2017 · $863
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET TORAHone grant, 2017 · $500
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
To further jewish education in israel
Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide
Furtherance of jewish education
To support charitable organization and programs providing food, clothing and financial aid to indigent individuals and families in financial distress.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel
Religious School
To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.
The organization's mission is to support orthodox jewish religious communities in israel in connection with a broad range of religious and social needs and activities, including wihtout limitation the support of religious practice and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Food Distribution Inc Co Mr Avi Schoemann and the most unlike its peers is Our Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KULANU INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL FOOD DISTRIBUTION INC CO MR AVI SCHOEMANN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF GENESIS JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC ↗
- Who funds NECHAMAS ZION ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
- Who funds EZRAT ACHIM FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds OUR PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Cross River Community Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Human Growth Foundation · Harvey and Shelli Dachs Charitable Foundation Trust · Ip Foundation · Royal Heritage Foundation Inc · EMT Action Fund · F G Foundation · The Hirsch Family Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ganger Foundation Inc · Swieca Children Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosenberg Family Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rosenberg Family Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to Rosenberg Family Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.