Skip to content

· Community foundation

Roscommon County Community Foundation

A community foundation dedicated to improving the quality of life for all present and future residents of roscommon county, by providing stewardship and leadership, by attracting and holding permanent endowment funds from a wide range of donors, and by making grants of the income from its permanent endowment funds.

$863k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$564k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$436kRecreation & Sports$81kPhilanthropy$80kHealth$60kFood & Nutrition$52kHuman Services$48kEnvironment$13kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $230k
  • $250k+1 grant · $564k
$7,335
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$564,365
NORTHERN MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S ASSESS$230,399
MIDMICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVIC$19,405
ACT NOW$10,850
ROSCOMMON COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEME$7,335
KIRTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI$6,772
ST VINCENT DEPAUL-PRUDENVILLE$6,500
ROSCOMMON AREA DISTRICT LIBRARY$5,948
SUNDROP MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL INC$5,630
ARK ASSOCIATION TO RESCUE KRITTERS$5,484
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ST VINCENT DEPAUL-PRUDENVILLE: $12k → 16%ST VINCENT DEPAUL-PRUDENVILLE: $11k → 16%ST VINCENT DEPAUL-PRUDENVILLE: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$474k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +157% since the first grant, against -90% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$1.5M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+157%
-90%

Still filing today

27%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $286k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPublic BenefitHealthEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    HIGGINS LAKE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +208%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +43%
  • AA
    ARK ASSOCIATION TO RESCUE KRITTERS
    2× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • RI
    RCCF INDEPENDENCE OPERATING FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $80k
  • GN
    GAHAGAN NATURE PRESERVE
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -90%
  • CC
    CRAF CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mariton Wildlife Sanctuary and Wilderness Trust
—
2
Hubbard County Food Shelf

Receive and dispense food to needy clients

—
3
Roscommon County Habitat for Humanity

To repair, reconstruct, and build homes for persons in need of decent housing.

—
4
Shaktoolik Native Store Native Village of Shaktoolik

Community service

—
5
Society of St Vincent De Paul of Monroe Inc

To operate and maintain a charitable store operated to collect used merchandise and resell said merchandise at low cost back to the community.

Human Services
6
Kivalina Native Store Native Village of Kivalina

Community service

—
7
Otsego County Community Food Pantry

Mission is to provide food to in need families of otsego county as well as weekend food to in need children

Food & Nutrition
8
Ritchie County Humane Society

Humane education:care of stray & unwanted dogs & cats: spay/neuter services serving a county population of over 10,000.

Animals
9
Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation

Since 1955 the Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation has sponsored natural science research on the lands and waters of the Lake Superior area. The Foundation maintains the Ives Lake Research Station with access to a 6,000 hectare research…

—
10
Delmar Public Library Commission Inc

Public library services

—
11
Harbor Springs Community Food Pantry

To alleviate hunger and enhance the well-being of our community by providing nutritious food and support to individuals and families in need. we are dedicated to fostering a more equitable and connected community through compassionate…

Food & Nutrition
12
Randolph Area Food Shelf

Provide food supplies to people in need in the central vermont communities of randolph, braintree, brookfield, and east granville.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Michigan Children's Assessment Center; the most unlike its peers is Roscommon County Food Pantry Project Hope of Roscommon Count. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS: $846,406 · OtherVARIOUSNORTHERN MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S ASSESS: $109,525 · OtherNORTHERN MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S ASSESSHOUGHTON LAKE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $83,612 · OtherHOUGHTON LAKE COMMUNITY SCHOOLSROSCOMMON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $82,581 · OtherROSCOMMON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLSRCCF INDEPENDENCE OPERATING FUND: $80,000 · OtherROSCOMMON AREA DISTRICT LIBRARY: $72,770 · Other+22 more: $270,111 · Other+22 moreNORTHERN MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER: $230,399 · Public BenefitNORTHERN MICH…HIGGINS LAKE FOUNDATION: $60,164 · EnvironmentROSCOMMON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY PROJECT HOPE OF ROSCOMMON COUNT: $42,390 · Food & NutritionTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $28,500 · Human ServicesGAHAGAN NATURE PRESERVE: $12,721 · AnimalsARK ASSOCIATION TO RESCUE KRITTERS: $12,164 · AnimalsMIDMICHIGAN HEALTH SERVICES: $19,405 · HealthSUNDROP MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL INC: $5,630 · Education
Other$1,545,005Public Benefit$230,399Environment$60,164Food & Nutrition$42,390Human Services$28,500Animals$24,885Health$19,405Education$5,630

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER: $230,399 over 1y, 11% of budgetHIGGINS LAKE FOUNDATION: $60,164 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetROSCOMMON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY PROJECT HOPE OF ROSCOMMON COUNT: $42,390 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $28,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetGAHAGAN NATURE PRESERVE: $12,721 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetARK ASSOCIATION TO RESCUE KRITTERS: $12,164 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetKIRTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,772 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSUNDROP MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL INC: $5,630 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIGGINS LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROSCOMMON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY PROJECT HOPE OF ROSCOMMON COUNT ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
  • Who funds MIDMICHIGAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GAHAGAN NATURE PRESERVE ↗
  • Who funds ARK ASSOCIATION TO RESCUE KRITTERS ↗
  • Who funds KIRTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNDROP MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roscommon County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roscommon County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roscommon County Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roscommon County Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roscommon County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph