Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ron & Linda McGimpsey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$42kHealth$41kHuman Services$35kCommunity Improvement$20kEnvironment$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kPhilanthropy$12kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army$6,000
Family Promise$5,000
American Red Cross$4,000
United Way$3,000
World Vision$3,000
Doctors Without Borders$3,000
Nature Conservancy$3,000
Arthritus Foundation$1,000
Susan G Komen Foundation$1,000
Christopher Reeve Foundation$1,000
American Diabetes Association$1,000
American Cancer Society$1,000
Tamassee DAR School$1,000
One Acre Fund$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $4k → 14%American Red Cross: $3k → 14%American Red Cross: $2k → 14%American Red Cross: $2k → 14%American Red Cross: $2k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OH
NJ
CO
VA
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 17 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$160k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-36%

Still filing today

65%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +38%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +39%
  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • TD
    Tamassee DAR School Inc
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
5
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
American Heart Association Inc

The american heart association's mission is to be a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives.

Health
8
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
9
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tamassee Dar School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salvation Army: $35,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFamily Promise: $14,000 · OtherFamily PromiseUnited Way: $12,000 · OtherUnited WayCase Alumni Fund: $7,000 · OtherCase Alumni FundIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHabitat for Humanity: $4,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherWORLD VISION INC: $14,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES …ONE ACRE FUND: $8,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDEducate: $6,000 · InternationalEducateThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $6,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $6,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLERO…CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDA…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY …ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCAmerican Diabetes Association: $5,500 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Associ…BONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOR…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $14,000 · Human Services
Other$92,500International$42,000Health$40,500Human Services$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEducate: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Educate ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds BONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tamassee DAR School Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ron & Linda McGimpsey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ron & Linda McGimpsey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ron & Linda McGimpsey Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ron & Linda McGimpsey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ron & Linda McGimpsey’s filings →

More from the funding graph