Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roman-Mason Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Religion$162kEducation$17kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$7kHealth$6kYouth Development$5kAnimals$4kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$16,666
MINING & MECHANICAL INSTITUTE$1,000
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY -$1,000
GREATER HAZLETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
HAZLETON ANIMAL SHELTER$350
UNITED CHARITIES$300
CAMP CADET TROOP N$250
MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER HAZLETON$250
HAZLETON SALVATION ARMY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED CHARITIES: $300 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $300 → 15%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $500 → 15%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $500 → 15%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $500 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $400 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $400 → 15%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $400 → 15%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $400 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $400 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $325 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $325 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $300 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $300 → 15%UNITED CHARITIES: $300 → 15%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 15 repeat orgs$550 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$212k
$550

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+229%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREATER HAZLETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    10× · 2017–2026 · $7k · revenue +53%
  • CC
    CAMP CADET TROOP N
    10× · 2017–2026 · $4k · revenue +26%
  • UC
    UNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $3k · revenue ×42

Funded once

  • MT
    MINSI TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $300 · revenue +229%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF GEATER HAZLETON
    one grant, 2022 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hazleton Cemetery Association

Providing cemetery and mausoleum facilities

—
2
Hazleton Animal Shelter Association Inc

Provide food shelter and care (including veterinary care) to homeless animals of the greater hazleton area.

Animals
3
The Helping Hands Society of Hazleton Area Schuylkill and Carbon County Inc

--to provide training and therapy services for disabled children and adults in luzerne, schuylkill, and carbon counties in pennsylvania.

Human Services
4
Zelienople Historical Society

Provides a repository of significant items relating to the history of zelienople pa and makes such items available to the public.

Arts & Culture
5
Greater Hazleton Senior Citizens Services Inc

The greater hazleton senior citizens service facilitates the operations of a senior center on broad street in hazleton. our organization manages the center and strives to improve the quality of life for our area's aging residents.

Human Services
6
Hazleton Area Public Library

To inform, enlighten, and entertain all people living in the hazletonarea communities by providing access to books, programs, and materialsthat foster community spirit, learning, and growth.

Education
7
Greater Hazleton Chamber of Commerce

Promote community businesses, improve business climate, public relations, and quality of life in greater hazleton

—
8
Harvard Club of Southern Ct

To distribute funds to harvard university for use as scholarships in their summer internship program

—
9
Hadley Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical memorabilia - town of Hadley MA

—
10
Harvard Historical Society

To collect and preserve historical material and artifacts, to encourage research into local history and to offer historical education opportunities to the community

Arts & Culture
11
Hinsdale Historical Society

Collect, preserve, and promote hinsdale history.

—
12
Historical Society of Montgomery County

The historical society of montgomery county's mission is to preserve, interpret and promote the history of montgomery county, pennsylvania and to educate the public about the region's ongoing multi-faceted cultural story... creating…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Charities of Hazleton Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greater Hazleton Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $156,622 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherGREATER HAZLETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,200 · Other+11 more: $27,425 · Other+11 moreUNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC: $3,350 · Human ServicesHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $2,550 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,500 · Health
Other$201,247Human Services$5,900Health$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER HAZLETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,200 over 10y, 7.6% of budgetMINING AND MECHANICAL INSTITUTE MMI PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $6,600 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP CADET TROOP N: $4,450 over 10y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC: $3,350 over 10y, 1.6% of budgetHAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC: $2,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER HAZLETON INC: $2,300 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMINSI TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TRUST: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER HAZLETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MINING AND MECHANICAL INSTITUTE MMI PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CADET TROOP N ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHARITIES OF HAZLETON INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER HAZLETON INC ↗
  • Who funds MINSI TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roman-Mason Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roman-Mason Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roman-Mason’s filings →

    More from the funding graph