Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rollins M and Amalie L Koppel Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2017
18
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Rollins M and Amalie L Koppel Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Tulsa Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Rollins M and Amalie L Koppel Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $45k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
4
’18
2
’19
0
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$2.3MReligion$83kCivil Rights$27kEducation$17kHealth$14kAnimals$5kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2017 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,224
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM - AUSTIN$5,300
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
HARLINGEN HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NATHAN KOPPEL ENDOWED PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLARSHIP$3,000
M D ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$2,750
TEMPLE EMANUEL$2,224
BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$1,500
IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$1,000
RGV MUSEUM ASSOCIATION$1,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
CITY MANAGER'S GOLF CLASSIC$500
GIRLS SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$104k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-83%
+37%

Still filing today

20%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $65k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH SHALOM - AUSTIN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue -83%

Funded once

  • OL
    OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • HH
    HARLINGEN HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
2
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
3
Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.

Philanthropy
4
Torah Day School of Dallas

Torah Day School of Dallas is a day school for jewish children grades kindergarden through eigth grade along with pre-school for one through four year old jewish children. The school provides a general studies and secular education meeting…

Education
5
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
8
Texas Defender Service

See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…

Civil Rights
9
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
10
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
11
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
12
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Greater South Texas; the most unlike its peers is Dallas Jewish Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,305,454 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyTEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $65,000 · OtherOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOM - AUSTIN: $13,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherHARLINGEN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherDELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $15,308 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,500 · HealthNYOS CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $1,500 · EducationTHE LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationIDEA Public Schools: $1,000 · EducationBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesDallas Jewish Historical Society: $100 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,305,954Other$143,058Health$11,500Education$3,500Human Services$1,000Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,305,454 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Jewish Historical Society: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Jewish Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rollins M and Amalie L Koppel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rollins M and Amalie L Koppel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rollins M and Amalie L Koppel’s filings →

More from the funding graph