Skip to content

· Public charity

Rogers Development Foundation

To assist in the development of projects, studies, and other activities and to aid in the planning, development, and improvement of the city of rogers, arkansas.

$303k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
6
States reached
$166k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $166k
$10,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$165,650
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,513
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS$18,750
HENDRIX COLLEGE$13,500
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$12,750
ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY$12,050
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$10,250
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$8,750
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$8,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVSERITY$7,750
OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$7,000
HARDING UNIVERSITY$6,775
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$6,000
JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $9k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $13k → 15%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVSERITY: $8k → 19%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $166k → 14%HENDRIX COLLEGE: $14k → 15%ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $12k → 15%OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%BELMONT UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $8k → 27%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $19k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $165,650 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSASNORTHWEST ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,513 · OtherNORTHWEST ARKANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $18,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSASARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $12,050 · OtherMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,250 · Other+3 more: $22,525 · Other+3 moreHENDRIX COLLEGE: $13,500 · EducationHENDRIX COLLEGEThe University of Tulsa: $12,750 · EducationThe University of T…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $8,750 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationOUACHITA BAPTIST UN…Belmont University: $6,000 · EducationBelmont UniversityJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationJOHN BROWN UNIVERSI…
Other$249,738Education$53,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENDRIX COLLEGE: $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $12,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $8,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarding University Inc: $6,775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rogers Development Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rogers Development Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The University of Tulsa: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rogers Development Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rogers Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $402k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rogers Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph