Skip to content

Arkansas · Public charity

Rogers Development Foundation

To assist in the development of projects, studies, and other activities and to aid in the planning, development, and improvement of the city of rogers, arkansas.

$303k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
14
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$10,250
Largest grant, FY2017
$165,650
States reached, FY2017
6
Total assets, FY2017
$1.2M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Arkansas$165,6501n/a
Northwest Arkansas Community College$20,5131n/a
University of Central Arkansas$18,7501n/a
Hendrix College$13,50010%
The University of Tulsa$12,75010%
Arkansas Tech University$12,0501n/a
Missouri State University$10,2501n/a
Baylor University$8,75010%
University of Georgia$8,0001n/a
Oklahoma State Univserity$7,7501n/a
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Rogers Development Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Arkansas$165,6501n/a
Northwest Arkansas Community College$20,5131n/a
University of Central Arkansas$18,7501n/a
Hendrix College$13,50010%
The University of Tulsa$12,75010%
Arkansas Tech University$12,0501n/a
Missouri State University$10,2501n/a
Baylor University$8,75010%
University of Georgia$8,0001n/a
Oklahoma State Univserity$7,7501n/a
Ouachita Baptist University$7,00010%
Harding University Inc$6,77510%
Belmont University$6,00010%
John Brown University$5,00010%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rogers Development Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rogers Development Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rogers Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Rogers Development Foundation

How much does Rogers Development Foundation give?
Rogers Development Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $302,738 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Rogers Development Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are Rogers Development Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: University of Arkansas ($166k), Northwest Arkansas Community College ($21k), University of Central Arkansas ($19k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Rogers Development Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Arkansas Community Foundation Inc, Tulsa Community Foundation, National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Where is Rogers Development Foundation based?
Rogers Development Foundation is based in AR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $402k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rogers Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph