Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
75%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$26,302
Organizations funded a year
3 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$606k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 75% of the organizations Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 61% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$71k0%
FY20244$58k75%
FY20235$96k60%
FY20223$66k0%
FY20216$67k0%
FY20206$72k50%
FY20193$42k0%
FY20183$33k100%
84% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$271kHealth$86kArts & Culture$59kReligion$48kEducation$31kFood & Nutrition$500Animals$450Human Services$360Other$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
PA
MD
AZ
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($380k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMotown Historical Musuem Inc: $52,300 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBeaumont Health Foundation: $40,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity Health Corporation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMount Sinai Medical Center Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Contemporary Art Detroit: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc: $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Guide Dog Center for the Blind: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCavalier Rescue of Florida Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation with peer funders

About Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation

How much does Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation give?
Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $76,302 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (42%), Health (13%), Arts & Culture (9%).
Who are Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Motown Historical Musuem Inc ($52k), Beaumont Health Foundation ($40k), Trinity Health Corporation ($15k).
Does Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation based?
Rodger and Loree Wasserman Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rodger and Loree Wasserman’s filings →

More from the funding graph