Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rockstad Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$265k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$468kInternational$323kPhilanthropy$100kCommunity Improvement$75kEducation$65kArts & Culture$45kYouth Development$27kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sanford Health Foundation$200,000
Stitching Office for the New Earth$50,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Mountain-Plains Youth Services Coalition: $27k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 63% of Rockstad Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Rockstad Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$816k · 5 repeat orgs$574k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$816k
$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+88%

Still filing today

80%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $265k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Gaia Home
    4× · 2021–2024 · $468k · revenue -51%
  • GW
    GLOBAL WATER CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $250k · revenue +317%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2017–2021 · $73k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CR
    COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -81%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • SH
    STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue ×16
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
5
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
6
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
7
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
8
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
11
Greater Public

Through bold leadership, Greater Public (GP) inspires and empowers public media organizations to advance their missions by ensuring a sustainable financial future.

—
12
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Comic Relief Inc Dba Comic Relief Us; the most unlike its peers is State Historical Society of North Dakota Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Gaia Home: $468,211 · HealthGaia HomeSanford Health Foundation: $200,000 · OtherSanford Health FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientStitching Office for the New Earth: $50,000 · OtherStitching Office for the New EarthSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DA…Bismarck State College: $30,000 · OtherBismarck State CollegeIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherMissouri River Educational Cooperative: $15,000 · Other+3 more: $12,180 · OtherGLOBAL WATER CENTER: $250,000 · InternationalGLOBAL WATER CENTERSave The Children Federation Inc: $72,668 · InternationalSave The Children Federati…COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US: $100,000 · PhilanthropyMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS: $26,500 · Human ServicesTHE INNOVATION SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationGreat Plains Food Bank: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$468,211Other$442,180International$322,668Philanthropy$100,000Human Services$26,500Education$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGaia Home: $468,211 over 4y, 21% of budgetGLOBAL WATER CENTER: $250,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $72,668 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS: $26,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE INNOVATION SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Gaia Home ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL WATER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOVATION SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rockstad Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rockstad Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rockstad Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rockstad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rockstad’s filings →

More from the funding graph