Skip to content
Robeson County Partnership for Children at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Robeson County Partnership for Children

To make a compelling impact on Robeson County families by collaborating with early childhood agencies to support programs that measurably develop young children and their caregivers for success.

$4.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$21MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$470kArts & Culture$89k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.1M
$135,891
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Public Schools of Robeson County$1,879,652
First Baptist Church of Lumberton$251,650
Riverwood Pre Elementary II LLC$232,237
Kids Academy LLC$230,080
Robeson Community College$228,043
Tiny Tots Day Care$207,072
Cottonwood Pre-Elementary Inc$195,568
Kidz Pointe Learning Center$138,767
Wee Farm Learning Center LLC$135,891
Precious Angels' Day Care Inc$107,131
Pamper Hugs & Luvs Learning Center 2 Inc$100,660
Jabbill LLC dba Kid Kare Learning Center$93,470
Angel's Childcare & Learning Center LLC$83,404
Little Feet Learning Acaademy Inc$63,991
Robeson County Health Department$56,970
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 25%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 25%Tiny Tots Day Care: $245k → 15%Pamper Hugs & Luvs Learning Center 2 Inc: $212k → 26%Tiny Tots Day Care: $223k → 15%Pamper Hugs & Luvs Learning Center 2 Inc: $191k → 26%Tiny Tots Day Care: $210k → 15%Christine's Christian Day Care Inc: $145k → 26%Tiny Tots Day Care: $207k → 15%Pamper Hugs & Luvs Learning Center 2 Inc: $126k → 26%Tiny Tots Day Care: $204k → 15%Jabbill LLC dba Kid Kare Learning Center: $134k → 26%Riverwood Pre Elementary II LLC: $232k → 26%Robeson County Health Department: $347k → 26%Robeson County Health Department: $321k → 26%Robeson County Health Department: $306k → 26%Robeson County Health Department: $290k → 26%Kids Academy LLC: $270k → 26%First Baptist Church of Lumberton: $267k → 26%Little Hands LLC: $264k → 26%First Baptist Church of Lumberton: $252k → 26%Kids Academy LLC: $247k → 26%Kids Academy LLC: $243k → 26%Little Hands LLC: $243k → 26%Kids Academy LLC: $230k → 26%Kids Academy LLC: $226k → 26%Little Hands LLC: $197k → 26%CCDC Inc: $145k → 26%Jamestown Daycare Center Inc: $151k → 26%Public Schools of Robeson County: $2.1M → 26%Public Schools of Robeson County: $1.9M → 26%Public Schools of Robeson County: $1.9M → 26%Public Schools of Robeson County: $1.9M → 26%Public Schools of Robeson County: $1.7M → 26%Cottonwood Pre-Elementary Inc: $264k → 26%Cottonwood Pre Elementary Inc: $243k → 26%Robeson Community College: $228k → 26%Robeson Community College: $220k → 26%Robeson Community College: $213k → 26%Robeson Community College: $207k → 26%Robeson Community College: $202k → 26%Cottonwood Pre-Elementary Inc: $196k → 26%Cottonwood Pre-Elementary Inc: $152k → 26%Wee Farm Learning Center LLC: $146k → 26%Wee Farm Learning Center LLC: $136k → 26%Riverbend Services Inc: $130k → 26%Cottonwood Pre-Elementary Inc: $125k → 26%Riverbend Services Inc: $121k → 26%Kidz Pointe Learning Center: $145k → 26%Kidz Pointe Learning Center: $139k → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 21 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
0

Total granted

$23M
$0

Still filing today

5%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    Public Sch of Robeson Co
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9.5M
  • TT
    Tiny Tots Day Care
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M
  • CO
    County of Robeson
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.3M

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    1/1
    Grantees still filing
    1/1
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Public Sch of Robeson Co: $9,533,655 · OtherPublic Sch of Robeson CoTiny Tots Day Care: $1,715,017 · OtherTiny Tots Day CareCounty of Robeson: $1,322,191 · OtherCounty of RobesonKids Academy LLC: $1,216,504 · OtherKids Academy LLCRobeson Community College: $1,070,069 · OtherCottonwood Pre-Elementary Inc: $979,149 · OtherLittle Hands LLC: $780,773 · Other+14 more: $6,012,055 · Other+14 more
    Other$22,629,413

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUMBER RIVER UNITED WAY: $88,600 over 4y, 3.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LUMBER RIVER UNITED WAY ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Robeson County Partnership for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robeson County Partnership for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Robeson County Partnership for Children’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home