Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roberts P & Ella B Hudson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$167kArts & Culture$111kEducation$54kHuman Services$53kYouth Development$34kEnvironment$23kPhilanthropy$20kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF THE EUP$10,000
SOO THEATRE PROJECT INC$9,000
BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP$5,000
SOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
DIANE PEPPLER RES CENTER$2,500
GREAT LAKES SHIPWRECK SOCIETY$2,500
SAULT SHRINE CLUB$2,500
SAULT AREA ARTS COUNCIL$2,000
UNITED WAY OF THE EUP$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
SAULT AREA SCHOOLS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
CARE NET PREGNANCY OF THE EUP$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHIPPEWA COUNTY FAMILY PROJECT: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 46 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
16

Total granted

$496k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+46%

Still filing today

17%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SOO THEATRE PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +142%
  • BC
    BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +65%
  • SL
    SOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue ×68

Funded once

  • LS
    LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • CC
    CHIPPEWA COUNTY FAMILY PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -17%
  • PC
    PICKFORD COMMUNITY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historical Society of Saginaw County

The historical society of saginaw county is committed to serve the community by telling the continuing story of the people of the saginaw region through exploration, preservation and presentation of their historical and cultural heritage.

—
2
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
3
Lake Superior Center

To engage and inspire, encouraging stewardship of wildlife and water.

Environment
4
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
5
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Chippewa Area History Center Inc

The chippewa area history center works to preserve local history and make it available to the public.

Arts & Culture
7
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
8
Michilimackinac Historical Society

To preserve, record and maintain the historical information of the area between michigan's upper and lower peninsulas, known as michilimackinac.

—
9
Great Lakes Museum of Science Environment and Technology

Our mission is to make science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) come alive, and our vision is a community where all people value stem to inform decision making and enrich lives. (continued on schedule o)guiding principles: we help…

Science & Tech
10
Upper Great Lakes Family Health Center

To provide exceptional health care services for all people in the Upper Great Lakes region regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Sand Lake Center for the Arts Circle Theatre Players Inc

Enrich community life via the theatre and creative arts.

—
12
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mymichigan Medical Center Sault; the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post #3. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPICE OF THE EUP: $50,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE EUPBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $43,000 · OtherBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMPLAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUN: $40,000 · OtherLAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNCHIPPEWA CTY FAMILY PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherCHIPPEWA CTY FAMILY PROJECTSALVATION ARMY: $24,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYDIANE PEPPLER RES CENTER: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherSAULT SHRINE CLUB: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,100 · OtherSUPERIOR HEALTH SUPPORT: $15,500 · Other+45 more: $153,800 · Other+45 moreSOO THEATRE PROJECT INC: $47,500 · Arts & CultureSOO THEATRE P…SOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $17,000 · Arts & CultureSOO LOCKS CHI…+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAULT: $15,000 · HealthCHIPPEWA COUNTY CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthGREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $2,500 · HealthSUPERIOR HEALTH SUPPORT SYSTEMSINC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterCHIPPEWA COUNTY FAMILY PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF THE EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$423,900Arts & Culture$65,000Health$27,500Housing & Shelter$6,000Human Services$2,500Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOO THEATRE PROJECT INC: $47,500 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $43,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $17,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAULT: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHIPPEWA COUNTY CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetSUPERIOR HEALTH SUPPORT SYSTEMSINC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAULT AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $4,900 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCHIPPEWA COUNTY FAMILY PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHistorical Society of Michigan: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOO THEATRE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds SOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAULT ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA COUNTY CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPERIOR HEALTH SUPPORT SYSTEMSINC ↗
  • Who funds SAULT AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA COUNTY FAMILY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eup Community Foundation Alliance IMI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eup Community Foundation Alliance I · Superior Health Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roberts P & Ella B Hudson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roberts P & Ella B Hudson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roberts P & Ella B Hudson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roberts P & Ella B Hudson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roberts P & Ella B Hudson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph