Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert W Murray Charitable Foundat

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.0MEducation$254kHuman Services$108kCrime & Legal$106kYouth Development$31kReligion$29kHousing & Shelter$18kCivil Rights$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $265,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $325,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$75,000
LAHEY CLINIC$55,000
WINCHESTER HOSPITAL$40,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$25,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$20,000
WOBURN COUNCIL OF SOCIAL CONCERN$15,000
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$15,000
PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN$5,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$2,000
PINE STREET INN$1,500
OLD NORTH FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $25k → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $25k → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 18 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +78% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+78%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAHEY CLINIC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $275k · revenue +32%
  • WH
    WINCHESTER HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +40%
  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • SC
    ST CHARLES CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TH
    THE HUNDRED CLUB OF MASS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…

Health
2
Beth Israel Lahey Health Primary Care

Beth israel lahey health primary care (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with the beth israel lahey health (bilh) network and serving the patients and communities served by the lahey clinic hospital (lahey…

3
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital - Milton

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-milton, inc. (bid-milton or hospital) is to provide safe, high-quality, community-based health care and access to tertiary care in close collaboration with its sister hospital, beth israel…

Health
4
Lahey Clinic Foundation Inc

The lahey clinic foundation, inc. (lcf) serves as the sole member and supports the lahey clinic (lc) and lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey hospital & medical center (lhmc), enabling lhmc and lc to provide superior health care leading to…

Health
5
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth Inc

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-plymouth, inc. (bid-plymouth or hospital) is to improve the health and well-being of its patients and communities by providing a full continuum of healthcare services with excellence and…

Health
6
Medical Care of Boston Management Corp

Medical care of boston management corp d/b/a beth israel lahey health primary care a/k/a affiliated physicians group (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with beth israel lahey health (bilh) and its hospitals…

Health
7
Lahey Clinic Hospital Inc

Lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey hospital & medical center (lhmc) is committed to providing superior health care leading to the best possible outcomes and experiences for every patient, advancing medicine through research and the…

Health
8
Joslin Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to search for a cure.

Health
9
Joslin Diabetes Center Inc

Our mission is to prevent, treat, and cure diabetes. our vision is a world free of diabetes and its complications.

Health
10
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
11
Anna Jaques Hospital Inc

The mission of anna jaques hospital (ajh or hospital) is to provide the highest quality medical care and improve the health of the communities served by ajh in alliance with the ajh medical staff and ajh affiliates including seacoast…

Health
12
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franciscan Hospital for Children and the most unlike its peers is James L Mckeown Boys and Girls Club of Woburn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $385,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALBURLINGTON SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $234,000 · OtherBURLINGTON SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $79,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWoburn Council of Social Concern Inc — $52,000 · OtherWoburn Council of Social Concern Inc+13 more — $90,850 · Other+13 moreLAHEY CLINIC INC — $275,000 · HealthLAHEY CLINIC INCWINCHESTER HOSPITAL — $210,000 · HealthWINCHESTER HOSPITALFranciscan Hospital for Children — $50,000 · HealthFranciscan Hospital for Children+2 more — $16,200 · HealthPacific Legal Foundation — $102,500 · Crime & LegalPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC — $56,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC — $8,500 · Human ServicesJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC — $30,500 · Youth DevelopmentROSIE'S PLACE INC — $9,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$900,850Health$551,200Crime & Legal$102,500Human Services$64,500Youth Development$30,500Housing & Shelter$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAHEY CLINIC INC — $275,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWINCHESTER HOSPITAL — $210,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $102,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC — $56,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetWoburn Council of Social Concern Inc — $52,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFranciscan Hospital for Children — $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC — $30,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNDRED CLUB OF MASS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNDRED CLUB OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe 100 Club of Rhode Island Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAHEY CLINIC INC
  • Who funds WINCHESTER HOSPITAL
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation
  • Who funds PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds Woburn Council of Social Concern Inc
  • Who funds Franciscan Hospital for Children
  • Who funds JAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds THE HUNDRED CLUB OF MASS INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds THE HUNDRED CLUB OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC
  • Who funds The 100 Club of Rhode Island Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert W Murray Charitable Foundat funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Winchester Hospital1% of income from government
  • Lahey Clinic Inc1% of income from government
  • Franciscan Hospital for Children0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert W Murray Charitable Foundat?

Find your warmest path to Robert W Murray Charitable Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph