Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert W Hemelgarn Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$31kEducation$23kReligion$4kHuman Services$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kYouth Development$1k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$224k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Promedica Home Medical$3,129
Individual grant recipient$2,236
American Racing Ministries$2,000
Ohio State University$1,000
Eastern Michigan University$1,000
Kent State University$1,000
Western Michigan University$500
Race for Kids$500
Monroe County Community College$500
Monroe County Community College$500
St Joseph$185
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Diabetes Youth Services: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
MO
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 6 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +195% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
35

Total granted

$18k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2018–2021 · $5k · revenue +195%
  • PH
    Promedica Home Medical
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k

Funded once

  • MM
    Michigan Medicine University of Michigan
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • MS
    Mercy St Vincent
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • MH
    Mercy health Physicians
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
5
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
De Gunzburg Myeloma Research Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
10
Progeria Research Foundation Inc

Discover treatments & cure for progeria & its aging related disorders, including heart disease.

Health
11
Solving Kids' Cancer Inc

Skc impacts children through the initiation of clinical research trials of investigative treatment strategies. our vision is to continue expanding the armamentarium of effective and less toxic treartment strategies for pediatric…

Health
12
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diabetes Youth Services; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $6,455 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMichigan Medicine University of Michigan: $4,781 · OtherMichigan Medicine University of MichiganUniversity of Michigan: $4,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganPromedica Home Medical: $4,115 · OtherPromedica Home MedicalIndividual grant recipient: $2,236 · OtherMercy St Vincent: $2,162 · OtherMercy health Physicians: $2,121 · OtherWilliams Syndrome Foundation: $2,000 · OtherAmerican Racing Ministries: $2,000 · OtherDowns Syndrome Association: $2,000 · OtherMercy St Vincent NW Region: $1,786 · Other+28 more: $18,746 · Other+28 moreSATB2 Gene Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthSATB2 Gene Fou…EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,000 · HealthEB RESEARCH PA…Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $2,000 · HealthPediatric Brai…DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthDYSTONIA MEDIC…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER U…DIABETES YOUTH SERVICES: $2,000 · Human ServicesRACE FOR THE KIDS: $1,250 · PhilanthropyBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $500 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE COLLEGE: $500 · Education
Other$52,902Health$8,500Human Services$2,000Philanthropy$1,250Youth Development$500Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $4,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSATB2 Gene Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES YOUTH SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRACE FOR THE KIDS: $1,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds SATB2 Gene Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
  • Who funds DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RACE FOR THE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert W Hemelgarn Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert W Hemelgarn Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert W Hemelgarn Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph