Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert W & Eileen E Hesse Memorial Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$200kHuman Services$127kEducation$115kReligion$107kHealth$50kFood & Nutrition$50kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE THEATRE FOUNDATION$35,000
FRANKENMUTH HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$15,000
SAGINAW COMMUNITY FOOD CLUB & KITCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%YMCA SAGINAW: $20k → 18%YMCA SAGINAW: $20k → 18%YMCA SAGINAW: $15k → 18%YMCA SAGINAW: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$581k · 15 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -50% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$581k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-50%

Still filing today

40%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TEMPLEARTS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +385%
  • MC
    MAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +25%
  • MC
    MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    3× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • RM
    RAUCHHOLZ MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MH
    MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
2
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
3
Michigan Theater Foundation Inc

To joyfully bring diverse people together to build community, enhance understanding, advance public storytelling and the arts, and protect our historic buildings.

Arts & Culture
4
Midland Center for the Arts Inc

To entertain, educate and inspire a diverse and expanding regional audiences in the arts, sciences and humanities.

Arts & Culture
5
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
6
Muskegon Heritage Association

Maintain historical museum

—
7
Home Builders Association of Michigan

A voice of the building industry in Michigan. The primary purpose is to positively influence the legislative, regulatory and legal issues that affect the industry.

—
8
Historical Society of Michigan

The Historical Society of Michigan will foster in citizens a deeper understanding of and appreciation for all Michigan history through programs and publications; preserve and promote Michigan history through conferences, publications,…

Arts & Culture
9
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
11
Michigan Philharmonic

To enrich the communities of Southeastern Michigan in fostering excellence and innovation to our community in the performance of orchestral music to educate current and future audiences

—
12
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Templearts; the most unlike its peers is Temple Theatre Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYPEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $70,000 · OtherPEACE LUTHERAN CHURCHTEMPLE THEATRE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherTEMPLE THEATRE FOUNDATIONSAGINAW COMMUNITY FOOD CLUB & KITCH: $50,000 · OtherSAGINAW COMMUNITY FOOD CLUB & KITCHYMCA: $40,000 · OtherYMCAIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $18,500 · OtherCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $62,500 · Other+10 moreTEMPLEARTS: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTEMPLEARTSMAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS: $39,500 · Arts & CultureMAJOR CHORDS FOR MIN…MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMID-MICHIGAN CHILDRE…FRANKENMUTH HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFRANKENMUTH HISTORIC…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW: $70,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS …COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthMICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE: $10,000 · HealthSaginaw Community Foundation: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$441,000Arts & Culture$124,500Human Services$70,000Health$50,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW: $70,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTEMPLEARTS: $40,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetMAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS: $39,500 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLEARTS ↗
  • Who funds MAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
  • Who funds FRANKENMUTH HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saginaw Community FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saginaw Community Foundation · Frank N Andersen Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Morley Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Yeo Family Foundation · Drsamuel Shaheen Family Foundation · Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation · Alice E Turner Memorial Trust · Wm McNally Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert W & Eileen E Hesse Memorial Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert W & Eileen E Hesse Memorial Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert W & Eileen E Hesse Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph