Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert Rosenheim Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$8.3MAnimals$2.2MEnvironment$800kRecreation & Sports$642kHuman Services$580kEducation$420kYouth Development$350kPhilanthropy$302kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRISTOL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT$1,598,100
LITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS$1,000,000
CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL$370,569
SHEPARD MEADOWS THERAPEUTIC RIDING$200,000
BRISTOL ADULT RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$10,000
PINK ROSE FUND$10,000
THE GILBERT SCHOOL$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRISTOL INC$9,000
CHAPEL HAVEN$5,000
KIDS IN THE CANYON$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $655k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CAROLYN'S PLACE INC: $100k → 12%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $5k → 9%THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY: $200k → 9%THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY: $100k → 9%THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY: $100k → 9%THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY: $100k → 9%THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 19 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
28

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+50%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2018–2023 · $2.8M · revenue +74%
  • TC
    The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital
    3× · 2020–2024 · $931k · revenue +31%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $550k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAULS HIGH SCHOOL BRISTOL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • CV
    CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +37%
  • KC
    KidsPlay Childrens Museum Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $110k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
2
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
3
Capitol Child Development Center Inc

Non-profit organization which was founded by the state of ct general assembly as a model for employer - sponsored childcare programs.

4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
6
The Hospital of Central Connecticut

The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
The Children's School

An independent, nonprofit school serving the lower fairfield county area of connecticut for children ages three to eight, and providing an environment that fosters in children the joy of learning through the use of innovative materials and…

Education
8
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
9
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

10
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
11
Wethersfield Historical Society

The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
12
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is William L Gilbert School Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports LeaguesLocal History MuseumsPet and Equine RescueConnecticut Land TrustsAffordable Senior HousingVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Early Childhood Care CentersLocal Grantmaking and Commu…Connecticut Community Devel…Disability Services and Sup…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr12%3%5–10yr17%17%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr20%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr17%10%10–20yr18%4%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr20%58%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
9%
1,114/11,741

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRISTOL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT — $2,584,000 · OtherBRISTOL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENTSHEPARD MEADOWS THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $1,864,375 · OtherSHEPARD MEADOWS THERAPEUTIC RIDINGENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF — $800,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OFBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRISTOL INC — $320,110 · OtherST PAULS HIGH SCHOOL BRISTOL INC — $250,000 · Other+28 more — $665,350 · Other+28 moreCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER — $2,785,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL…The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital — $930,712 · HealthThe Charlotte Hungerford Hospi…+1 more — $33,000 · HealthLITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS — $2,007,500 · AnimalsLITTLE GUILD OF …+1 more — $7,500 · AnimalsTHE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC — $550,000 · Human ServicesCAROLYNS PLACE INC — $100,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyMAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $195,000 · PhilanthropyMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL — $77,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyOUTSIDE PERSPECTIVES INC — $475,220 · EducationWILLIAM L GILBERT SCHOOL CORP — $20,000 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationSHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $160,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$6,483,835Health$3,748,712Animals$2,015,000Human Services$655,000Philanthropy$502,000Education$497,720Public Safety & Disaster$160,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER — $2,785,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS — $2,007,500 over 4y, 21% of budgetThe Charlotte Hungerford Hospital — $930,712 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC — $550,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetOUTSIDE PERSPECTIVES INC — $475,220 over 3y, 43% of budgetCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $195,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $160,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetKidsPlay Childrens Museum Inc — $110,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAROLYNS PLACE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL — $77,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC — $33,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM L GILBERT SCHOOL CORP — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRISTOL ADULT RESOURCE CENTER INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CANAAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetHOUSATONIC YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSHARON DAY CARE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILL-STEAD MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRISTOL CT LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPROJECT SAGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF CANTON FOOTBALL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds LITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS
  • Who funds The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital
  • Who funds THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds OUTSIDE PERSPECTIVES INC
  • Who funds CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds KidsPlay Childrens Museum Inc
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds CAROLYNS PLACE INC
  • Who funds MARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL
  • Who funds CHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC
  • Who funds WILLIAM L GILBERT SCHOOL CORP
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BRISTOL ADULT RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE CANAAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOUSATONIC YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC
  • Who funds SHARON DAY CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds FARMINGTON VALLEY MUDHOGS INC
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HILL-STEAD MUSEUM
  • Who funds BRISTOL CT LITTLE LEAGUE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation IncCT24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Walter and Phyllis Ann Borten Foundation · Findlay Family Foundation · Main Street Community Foundation Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert Rosenheim Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • The Arc of Litchfield County Inc97% of income from government
  • Bristol Adult Resource Center Inc94% of income from government
  • Housatonic Youth Service Bureau Inc33% of income from government
  • Chapel Haven Schleifer Center Inc13% of income from government
  • Hill-Stead Museum7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center5% of income from government
  • The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital3% of income from government
  • Maria Seymour Brooker Memorial1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert Rosenheim Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Robert Rosenheim Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph