Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert M and Barbara G Thomas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4kReligion$2kArts & Culture$820Human Services$750International$650Food & Nutrition$500Environment$250Housing & Shelter$225Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
1
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$500
Chicago Food Depository$250
Mercy Home for Boys and Girls$250
Catholic Charities$250
Northern Illinois Food Bank$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Charity Navigator: $50 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 8 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$13k
$995

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+95%

Still filing today

25%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k
  • DM
    DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FDTN
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k
  • IC
    Immaculate Conception Parish
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1k

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKE COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $125 · revenue +95%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2024 · $100
  • HI
    Heifer International
    one grant, 2020 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
6
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
7
Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation

This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…

Environment
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
10
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
11
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
12
American Rivers Inc

American rivers is championing a national effort to protect and restore all rivers, from remote mountain streams to urban waterways. healthy rivers provide people and nature with clean, abundant water and natural habitat. for 50 years,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The River Alliance of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foster Pet Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FDTN: $3,600 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FDTNImmaculate Conception Parish: $1,350 · OtherImmaculate Conception ParishDivine World Missionaries: $500 · OtherMercy Home for Boys and Girls: $500 · Other+11 more: $1,285 · Other+11 moreTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $600 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $550 · InternationalNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $250 · Food & NutritionFOSTER PET OUTREACH: $50 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORM: $50 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $35 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKE COUNTY: $125 · Housing & ShelterTHE RIVER ALLIANCE OF WISCONSIN INC: $50 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 · EnvironmentCharity Navigator: $50 · Human Services
Other$12,735Education$600International$550Food & Nutrition$250Animals$135Housing & Shelter$125Environment$100Human Services$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKE COUNTY: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIVER ALLIANCE OF WISCONSIN INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPENLANDS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER PET OUTREACH: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER ALLIANCE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds OPENLANDS ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER PET OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert M and Barbara G Thomas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert M and Barbara G Thomas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert M and Barbara G Thomas Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert M and Barbara G Thomas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert M and Barbara G Thomas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph