Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert I Glimcher Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$159k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Robert I Glimcher Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

21
’17
12
’18
18
’19
5
’20
11
’21
10
’22
11
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$704kReligion$218kPhilanthropy$216kYouth Development$85kEducation$82kHealth$81kArts & Culture$65kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$100,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY-HILLEL$15,000
PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST$10,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH$7,500
CHABAD OF SQUIRREL HILL INC$6,250
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH$5,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH$5,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$3,255
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,000
PELOTONIA$1,500
CONGREGATION POALE ZEDECK$1,375
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,000
MOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE$1,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$90
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THIS OLD HORSE: $500 → 6%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%YWCA OF COLUMBUS: $5k → 15%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $4k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH: $8k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH: $4k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 51% of Robert I Glimcher Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 36%.

Robert I Glimcher Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 24 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
45

Total granted

$462k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+41%

Still filing today

58%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $87k · revenue +28%
  • PC
    PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +41%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $24k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $29k
  • CW
    CLASSROOMS WITHOUT BORDERS (JEWISH FED OF PITTSBURGH)
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • PP
    PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
5
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
8
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
9
The Children's Institute Parent Company

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Mercer County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
29/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $703,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INCBOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC: $86,800 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INCCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $76,120 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $51,923 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEIndividual grant recipient: $28,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $25,655 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYCHABAD OF SQUIRREL HILL INC: $25,000 · OtherCHABAD OF SQUIRREL HILL INCCLASSROOMS WITHOUT BORDERS (JEWISH FED OF PITTSBURGH): $20,180 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY-HILLEL: $15,000 · Other+43 more: $109,086 · Other+43 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $213,514 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $55,000 · Arts & CultureALL STARS PROJECT INC: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,080 · Arts & CultureTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $23,750 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT: $10,800 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $8,600 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $20,613 · EducationPELOTONIA: $10,280 · EducationColumbus School for Girls: $10,000 · EducationMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE: $3,000 · Education+2 more: $1,500 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $8,500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $1,000 · HealthNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $613 · Health+1 more: $360 · Health
International$703,500Other$438,364Philanthropy$218,514Arts & Culture$65,080Human Services$49,650Education$45,393Health$12,473

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $703,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $213,514 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC: $86,800 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC: $23,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $20,613 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $12,118 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT: $10,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $10,280 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetColumbus School for Girls: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $8,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CONSERVATORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVATH ACHEI TMIMIM OF PITTSBURGH: $3,026 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSquirrel Hill Urban Coalition: $1,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAFRICAN ENVIRONMENTAL FILM FOUNDATION: $1,080 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $613 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $613 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MERCER COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHIS OLD HORSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTANLEY M MARKS BLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF LIFE OF PITTSBURGH: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds Columbus School for Girls ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CONSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVATH ACHEI TMIMIM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ALOYSIUS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds 5P SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater PittsburghPA21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · David S Shapira Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Herman & Helen Lipsitz Charitable Trust · Morris Charles M Tr Ua-Char · Massey Charitable Trust · The Fine Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Upmc Group · Giant Eagle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert I Glimcher Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert I Glimcher Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert I Glimcher Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph