Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Chinn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.4MPhilanthropy$494kEducation$10kScience & Tech$1kRecreation & Sports$1kCommunity Improvement$381Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$841k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIAN HALL OF FAME$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGEL ISLAND IMMIGRATION STATION FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%BRITISH MOTOR CORP: $1k → 11%ASIAN HALL OF FAME: $1.0M → 14%MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $10k → 17%NATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE: $381 → 12%SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $304k → 9%MORNING STAR KOREAN: $250 → 9%GSCCC: $100 → 9%ASIAN HALL OF FAME: $860k → 14%SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $180k → 9%ASIAN HALL OF FAME: $371k → 14%SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ASIAN HALL OF FAME: $75k → 14%SEATTLE SYMPHONY: $1k → 9%FIFTH AVENUE THEATRE: $1k → 9%VISIT SEATTLE: $500 → 9%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $450 → 9%SEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $300 → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%SEATTLE CHINESE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%COLLEGE SUCCESS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%COLLEGE SUCCESS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%ARTSFUND: $300 → 9%NW ASIAN WEEKLY: $50 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 3 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$2.4M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+210%

Still filing today

100%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ASIAN HALL OF FAME
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +73% · 73% of their budget
  • CS
    College Success Foundation
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +112%
  • SA
    SEATTLE ART MUSEUM
    2× · 2017–2019 · $750 · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue ×16
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +46%
  • SS
    SEATTLE SYMPHONY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
4
American Friends of the Shanghai Museum Inc

Founded in 1995, the american friends of the shanghai museum is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to raise awareness and financial support for the shanghai museum, continuing a distinguished history of patron support for…

Arts & Culture
5
Chinese Culture Foundation of San Francisco

To elevate underserved communities and gives voice to equality through education and contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Northwest Art

The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…

Arts & Culture
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
9
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
10
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
11
Seattle Chamber Music Society Foundation

Provide financial support to the Seattle Chamber Music Festival (dba Seattle Chamber Music Society).

Arts & Culture
12
Seattle Public Library Foundation

The seattle public library foundation inspires the community's philanthropic support, advocacy for, and pride in the library.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artsfund; the most unlike its peers is Angel Island Immigration Station Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASIAN HALL OF FAME: $2,352,148 · Arts & CultureASIAN HALL OF FAME+3 more: $11,050 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $493,500 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCollege Success Foundation: $5,000 · EducationSEATTLE SYMPHONY: $1,340 · OtherBRITISH MOTOR CORP: $1,052 · OtherSEATTLE CHINESE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · OtherFIFTH AVENUE THEATRE: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherNATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE: $381 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $360 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250 · OtherAngel Island Immigration Station Foundation: $250 · Other+2 more: $150 · Other
Arts & Culture$2,363,198Philanthropy$493,500Education$10,000Other$6,283

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIAN HALL OF FAME: $2,352,148 over 4y, 73% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $493,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Success Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTSFUND: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Island Immigration Station Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASIAN HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ARTSFUND ↗
  • Who funds Angel Island Immigration Station Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Chinn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Chinn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Chinn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph