Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert Arthur Seale Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2018
8
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Health$66kHousing & Shelter$60kEducation$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kPhilanthropy$29kAnimals$20kFood & Nutrition$15kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2018 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $103k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$20,000
CANNINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$20,000
SEELEY LAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$17,600
FEIST-WEILLER CANCER CENTER$15,000
HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
MAKE-A-WISH$10,000
NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK$10,000
CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA$8,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPARROW'S VINE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$87k · 4 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$87k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+43%

Still filing today

50%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +79%
  • FC
    FEIST-WEILLER CANCER CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k

Funded once

  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue +89%
  • WF
    WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +92%
  • PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
2
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
3
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
4
Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc

In partnership with donors, sioux falls area community foundation (sfacf) provides philanthropic leadership that assures the quality of life in our area, for good, for ever.the community foundation cultivates philanthropy by inspiring new…

Philanthropy
5
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
6
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

7
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
8
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation

The mission of the stephen siller tunnel to towers foundation is to honor the sacrifice of fdny firefighter stephen siller, and all those who laid down their lives to save others on september 11, 2001. we also honor our military, and first…

Education
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
11
Troops First Foundation Incorporated

To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

Public Benefit
12
Wesleylife Foundation

Guided by christian compassion, we provide the needed resources to support the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sparrows Vine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA — $40,300 · OtherCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANASHRINERS HOSPITAL — $20,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALFEIST-WEILLER CANCER CENTER — $17,000 · OtherFEIST-WEILLER CANCER CENTERHOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $15,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC CHURCHMAKE-A-WISH — $10,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISHSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION — $8,775 · OtherSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION+1 more — $2,000 · OtherHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS IN…SEELEY LAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $28,600 · PhilanthropySEELEY LAKE…PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $25,000 · HealthPROJECT HEA…SEELEY-SWAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,536 · HealthSEELEY-SWAN…WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EnvironmentWILDLAND …CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSPARROWS VINE — $1,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$113,075Housing & Shelter$60,000Philanthropy$28,600Health$28,536Environment$25,000Human Services$21,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LOUISIANA — $40,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEELEY LAKE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $28,600 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEELEY-SWAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,536 over 1y, 23% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert Arthur Seale Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph