Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert and Mary Jane Hekemian Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$227k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$729kHealth$508kEducation$427kArts & Culture$80kFood & Nutrition$39kYouth Development$36kInternational$19kHuman Services$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE RISEN KING$83,750
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$50,000
THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
HUDSON FARM FOUNDATION$12,000
HACKENSACK UNIV MEDICAL CTR FDTN$10,000
SADDLE RIVER DAY SCHOOL$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$9,000
TROOP B HEALTH & WELFARE FUND$5,000
ARMENIA TREE PROJECT$5,000
SADDLE RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,500
THE XO WORLD PROJECT$2,500
SISTERS OF CHARITY OF SAINT ELIZABETH$2,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,000
TEAM GOOSE ALS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GO 4 THE GOAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%GO 4 THE GOAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%GO 4 THE GOAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%DEPT FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: $2k → 4%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DE
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$243k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
43

Total granted

$1.6M
$228k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+28%

Still filing today

53%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +70%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $125k · revenue +39%
  • SR
    SADDLE RIVER DAY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • LC
    LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +45%
  • HP
    HACKENSACK PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue ×23
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Salem Health Foundation

The salem health foundation is dedicated to raising, managing and distributing funds to help salem health achieve its mission of improving the health and well-being of the people and community it serves.

Health
11
Staten Island University Hospital Foundation

The mission of staten island university hospital's foundation is to achieve philanthropic relationships for support and endowment, providing highest quality care, services and state of the art equipment. philanthropy has played an…

Health
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nercessian Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE RISEN KING: $645,500 · OtherCHURCH OF THE RISEN KINGHACKENSACK UNIV MEDICAL CTR FDTN: $320,000 · OtherHACKENSACK UNIV MEDICAL CTR FDTNWANDELL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $55,908 · OtherHACKENSACK PERFORMING ARTS: $50,000 · Other+47 more: $222,661 · Other+47 moreHACKENSACK MERIDIAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $125,000 · EducationHACKENSACK MERID…VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVER…UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN FOUNDATION INC: $15,782 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF AB…HO-HO-KUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,350 · Education+2 more: $950 · EducationTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · HealthTHE VALLE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 · HealthST JUDE C…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCROHN'S &…+3 more: $3,000 · HealthLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureHUDSON FARM FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · Food & NutritionGO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION: $23,000 · Human ServicesBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesDEPARTMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: $2,000 · Human ServicesARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $17,500 · International
Other$1,294,069Education$279,082Health$157,000Arts & Culture$75,000Food & Nutrition$33,000Human Services$30,000International$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHACKENSACK MERIDIAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSADDLE RIVER DAY SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSON FARM FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN FOUNDATION INC: $15,782 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetHO-HO-KUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,350 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUDSON FARM CLUB INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTROOP B HEALTH & WELFARE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Association for Armenian Studies and Research Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDEPARTMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE MIND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,027 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURGA TREE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE NERCESSIAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetPHILIP BEGONJA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL AUXILIARY: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLENDALE AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION INTERNATIONAL LTD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT PURPLE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOVNANIAN SCHOOL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $153 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HACKENSACK MERIDIAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SADDLE RIVER DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON FARM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HO-HO-KUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUDSON FARM CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TROOP B HEALTH & WELFARE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds National Association for Armenian Studies and Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds DEPARTMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds ONE MIND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Marron Foundation Inc · Nazarian Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Mary Jane Hekemian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Mary Jane Hekemian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • Saddle River Day School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hovnanian School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert and Mary Jane Hekemian Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Robert and Mary Jane Hekemian Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert and Mary Jane Hekemian’s filings →

More from the funding graph