Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Heather Grottke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$77kHealth$30kInternational$17kEducation$5kHousing & Shelter$5kRecreation & Sports$4kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St John Lutheran$15,000
Nathaniels Hope$15,000
St Paul Lutheran$10,000
Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
International Childrens Fund$1,500
Lambs Farm$500
St Jude$115
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%USC Norris: $1k → 14%Nathaniels Hope: $15k → 13%Hillsdale College: $3k → 14%International Childrens Fund: $2k → 11%St Paul Lutheran: $10k → 11%Str Jude Hospital: $1k → 17%Delta Upsilon: $1k → 16%Delta Upsilon Fraternity: $570 → 18%St John Lutheran: $20k → 7%Lambs Farm: $1k → 8%MD Anderson: $1k → 12%Northwestern University: $2k → 14%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%USC Norris: $1k → 14%Hillsdale College: $2k → 14%St Paul Evangelical Lutheran Church: $10k → 11%St Jude: $500 → 17%St John Lutheran: $15k → 7%Lambs Farm: $1k → 8%Anderson Hospital: $500 → 12%Northwestern Univ: $2k → 14%USC Norris: $1k → 14%St Paul Evangelical Lutheran Church: $10k → 11%St Jude: $115 → 17%St John Lutheran: $10k → 7%Lambs Farm: $500 → 8%Anderson Hospital: $500 → 12%Shriners Hospital: $1k → 14%PIH Helath Ctr: $1k → 14%Bridge Communities: $5k → 7%Shriners: $546 → 14%PIH Medical Ctr: $1k → 14%Shriners: $500 → 14%Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago: $10k → 14%Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago: $10k → 14%Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
IN
CT
CA
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 10 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$103k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+65%

Still filing today

40%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +33%
  • TL
    THE LAMBS FARM INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +40%
  • AH
    ANDERSON HOSPITAL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • SH
    Shriners Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Family Institute

Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.

—
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
7
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
8
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
9
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
10
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
11
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Children's Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St John Lutheran: $45,000 · OtherSt John LutheranCornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago: $25,000 · OtherCornerstone Counseling Ctr ChicagoSt Paul Evangelical Lutheran Church: $20,000 · OtherSt Paul Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSt Paul Lutheran: $10,000 · OtherSt Paul LutheranIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $13,731 · Other+12 moreNathaniel's Hope Inc: $15,000 · ReligionNathaniel's…BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationNorthwestern University: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $2,500 · EmploymentANDERSON HOSPITAL: $1,000 · Health
Other$118,731Religion$15,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Education$5,000Recreation & Sports$4,000Employment$2,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago: $25,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNathaniel's Hope Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON HOSPITAL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Nathaniel's Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Heather Grottke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Heather Grottke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Heather Grottke Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Heather Grottke Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Heather Grottke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph