Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Evelyn Hewlett Morgan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$176k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$330kRecreation & Sports$312kArts & Culture$244kFood & Nutrition$189kCommunity Improvement$146kHuman Services$68kHealth$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALDWELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$30,884
PRINCETON ART GUILD$21,530
COMMUNITY DISCIPLES$21,500
YOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUNTY$16,500
CALDWELL COUNTY SPECIAL OLYMPICS$11,500
CALDWELL COUNTY FOOD BANK CO CHRIST TABERNACLE CHURCH$10,000
DOTSON PARK CO CITY OF PRINCETON$9,286
FREDONIA VALLEY RIDING CLUB$9,000
BRIGHT LIFE FARMS$6,500
WHERE NEW BEGINNINGS START MINISTRIES$5,000
PRINCETON ROTARY CLUB$5,000
CREATE PRINCETON$4,710
GEORGE COON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$4,500
VENTURING CREW BSA CREW 3002 CO FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF PRINCETON$4,400
A BRIGHTER FUTURE LEARNING CENTER (CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOR EXCELLENCE)$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $25k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $20k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $20k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $16k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $15k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $9k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $7k → 15%BRIGHT LIFE FARMS: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 30 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-19%

Still filing today

20%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BRIGHT LIFE FARMS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +35%
  • FV
    FREDONIA VALLEY RIDING CLUB
    8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +33% · 57% of their budget
  • SH
    SAFE HAVEN INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • AE
    AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION - RR MORGAN FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FW
    FREDONIA WOODMEN PARK CO CITY OF FREDONIA
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Princeton Art Guild Inc: $185,020 · OtherPrinceton Art Guild IncCALDWELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $158,783 · OtherCALDWELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONCOMMUNITY DISCIPLES INCORPORATED: $145,650 · OtherCOMMUNITY DISCIPLES INCORPORATEDYOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN YOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN: $122,495 · OtherYOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN YOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUNIndividual grant recipient: $67,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCALDWELL COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC: $64,035 · OtherAMATEUR RADIO EMERGENCY SERVICE: $63,254 · OtherCALDWELL COUNTY FOOD BANK CO CHRIST TABERNACLE CHURCH: $56,000 · Other+32 more: $374,338 · Other+32 moreBRIGHT LIFE FARMS INC: $116,955 · Human ServicesBRIGHT LI…FREDONIA VALLEY RIDING CLUB: $90,775 · Recreation & SportsSAFE HAVEN INC: $11,000 · AnimalsA BRIGHTER FUTURE LEARNING CENTER: $6,660 · EducationASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $300 · Philanthropy
Other$1,237,425Human Services$116,955Recreation & Sports$90,775Animals$11,000Education$6,660Philanthropy$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrinceton Art Guild Inc: $185,020 over 8y, 54% of budgetYOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN YOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN: $122,495 over 8y, 15% of budgetBRIGHT LIFE FARMS INC: $116,955 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetFREDONIA VALLEY RIDING CLUB: $90,775 over 8y, 57% of budgetSAFE HAVEN INC: $11,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetA BRIGHTER FUTURE LEARNING CENTER: $6,660 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Princeton Art Guild Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN YOUTH INCORPORATED OF CALDWELL COUN ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT LIFE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDONIA VALLEY RIDING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds A BRIGHTER FUTURE LEARNING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Angeline Henry Trust Central Bank and Trust CompanyKY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Angeline Henry Trust Central Bank and Trust Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Evelyn Hewlett Morgan Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Evelyn Hewlett Morgan Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Evelyn Hewlett Morgan Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Evelyn Hewlett Morgan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Evelyn Hewlett Morgan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph