Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$273k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Hamilton Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’19
2
’20
1
’21
1
’22
4
’23
3
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$711kEnvironment$220kArts & Culture$186kEducation$82kHuman Services$55kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kAnimals$6kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION$90,000
PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTITUTE$20,000
GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$20,000
HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$13,000
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
EDGERTON CENTER$8,063
HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$7,000
HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%HAMPTON RURAL FIRE DISTRICT: $12k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $162k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $135k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $90k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $82k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $77k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50k → 8%PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $50k → 8%PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $50k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY 125 COMMITTEE: $45k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $40k → 8%BREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30k → 8%BREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $25k → 8%EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $20k → 8%EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $13k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $13k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%EDGERTON CENTER: $8k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 8%AURORA ADOPT A PET: $6k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $5k → 8%AURORA ADOPT A PET: $316 → 8%GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$450k · 5 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$450k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+103%

Still filing today

80%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST
    4× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +38%
  • HC
    HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $133k · revenue +2%
  • EE
    EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $35k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • HC
    HAMILTON COUNTY 125 COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2019 · $45k
  • HP
    HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • HR
    HAMPTON RURAL FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $711,246 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyPRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST: $220,000 · EnvironmentPRAIRIE PLAINS RESO…HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $133,337 · Arts & CultureHAMILTON COUNT…EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureEDGERTON EDUCA…HAMILTON COUNTY 125 COMMITTEE: $45,000 · OtherHAMILTON …HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherHAMPTON P…HAMPTON RURAL FIRE DISTRICT: $12,000 · OtherHAMPTON R…GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11,789 · OtherGILTNER P…EDGERTON CENTER: $8,063 · OtherEDGERTON …AURORA ADOPT A PET: $6,316 · OtherAURORA AD…HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $5,000 · OtherBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$731,246Environment$220,000Arts & Culture$168,337Other$103,168Recreation & Sports$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $711,246 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetPRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST: $220,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $133,337 over 5y, 18% of budgetBREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $55,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetEDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetHAMILTON RECREATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BREMER COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON RECREATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann FoundationNE20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann Foundation · Frank M & Alice M Farr Trust · Hamilton Community Foundation Inc · Dr James M Woodard and Mabel Woodard Trust · Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather Foundation Inc · Wortman Family Charitable Trust · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Bethel Kolar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph