Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert a and Renda L Zielke Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$566kEducation$70kHuman Services$49kPhilanthropy$4kInternational$1k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $62k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLE$12,000
ST JOHN'S NEUMANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS$10,000
ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK$10,000
SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT$10,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI$10,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA$6,000
SOLANUS CASEY CENTER$5,000
PIME MISSIONARIES$5,000
MISSIONARIES OF THE PRECIOUS BLOOD$5,000
ST STEPHENS INDIAN MISSION FDTN$5,000
SALESIAN MISSIONS$3,000
FRANCISCAN MISSIONS$3,000
TRINITY MISSIONS$3,000
HEART OF THE NATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $6k → 6%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $6k → 9%COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS: $10k → 16%ST JOHN'S NEUMANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 15%PIME MISSIONARIES: $5k → 8%PIME MISSIONARIES: $5k → 21%ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK: $10k → 16%DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLE: $18k → 12%SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $10k → 8%MISSIONARIES OF THE PRECIOUS BLOOD: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $12k → 8%TRINITY MISSIONS: $5k → 8%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $5k → 9%COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS: $10k → 16%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%PIME MISSIONARIES: $5k → 8%PIME MISSIONARIES: $5k → 21%ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK: $5k → 16%DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLE: $12k → 12%SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $5k → 8%MISSIONARIES OF THE PRECIOUS BLOOD: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $10k → 8%TRINITY MISSIONS: $5k → 8%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $5k → 9%COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS: $10k → 16%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%PIME MISSIONARIES: $5k → 21%DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLE: $6k → 12%SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $5k → 8%MISSIONARIES OF THE PRECIOUS BLOOD: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $10k → 8%COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS: $5k → 16%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%PIME MISSIONARIES: $5k → 21%DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLE: $6k → 12%SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $8k → 8%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $6k → 8%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $6k → 8%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%SOLANUS CASEY CENTER: $8k → 21%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%ST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 12%ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $10k → 15%ST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WI
MI
NY
WY
IN
OH
CT
NE
MD
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$670k · 20 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$670k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+84%

Still filing today

10%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF ORLANDO
    7× · 2017–2023 · $89k
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE US
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CM
    CAPUCHIN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • MA
    MISSIONARY ASSOCIATION OF MARY IMMA
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $90,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMIDIOCESE OF ORLANDO: $89,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF ORLANDOCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $67,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORTHERN ALASKAROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLE: $58,500 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF KNOXVILLETHE COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS (US): $50,000 · OtherTHE COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS (US)PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDER INC: $41,000 · OtherPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDER INCST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC SCHOOLPIME MISSIONARIES: $40,000 · OtherPIME MISSIONARIESSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $32,500 · OtherSISTERS OF ST BENEDICT: $25,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN MISSIONS: $24,000 · OtherST STEPHENS INDIAN MISSION FOUNDATI: $24,000 · Other+15 more: $92,600 · Other+15 moreETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $15,000 · ReligionSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC: $1,000 · International
Other$673,600Religion$15,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS (US): $50,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS (US) ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SUDAN RELIEF FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert a and Renda L Zielke Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert a and Renda L Zielke Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert a and Renda L Zielke Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph