Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robben Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$804k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$4.0MInternational$2.4MCivil Rights$1.8MEducation$1.3MArts & Culture$898kPublic Benefit$303kPhilanthropy$161kReligion$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$10,865
Median grant
2
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Collective Israel Actie (CIA) - Weizmann Ekard Institute Cancer Research$804,449
Stepping Stones Wilderness Initiative$302,643
The Orme School$60,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Nonceba$17,475
Stichting Stedelijk Museum Fonds$11,078
Film Independent$11,073
Singer MuseumStiching Singer Memorial Foundation$10,988
Prince Claus Fund for Culture and Development$10,865
Scalesia Foundation$10,000
Peninsula School Feeding Association (PSFA)$7,181
Museum Voorlinden$5,538
Individual grant recipient$5,538
Collective Israel Actie (CIA) Israeli Philharmonic$5,000
Freundeskreis Museum Kurhaus & Koekkoek Haus Kleve EV Grant$1,671
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 15% of grant dollars ($1.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 85% that went abroad ($9.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Phoenix Children's Foundation: $10k → 11%The Orme School: $60k → 14%Bucknell University: $250k → 11%Stepping Stones Wilderness Initiative: $303k → 10%Film Independent: $11k → 14%Central Fund of Israel (Olah Global): $1k → 6%Riverdale Country School: $3k → 9%Riverdale Country School: $5k → 28%Dead Sea Museum: $10k → 14%ICA Miami: $5k → 15%Center for Contemporary Art Tel Aviv: $3k → 17%So What Else: $5k → 8%Polo Cares Inc: $10k → 11%Bucknell University: $250k → 11%Central Fund of Israel (Echad Chiburim Olah): $1k → 6%Riverdale County School: $3k → 28%ReachingU A Foundation for Uraguay: $84k → 15%So What Else: $5k → 8%Polo Cares Inc: $5k → 11%Bucknell University: $250k → 11%Riverdale Country School: $3k → 28%Project Change: $5k → 8%Bucknell University: $250k → 11%Riverdale Country School: $3k → 28%Project Change: $5k → 8%Bucknell University: $250k → 11%Riverdale County School: $3k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 85% of all-years giving ($9.8M)

10 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Netherlands$9.3M · 120 grants
South Africa$232k · 20 grants
United Kingdom$123k · 10 grants
Belgium$41k · 2 grants
Israel$38k · 6 grants
Brazil$36k · 4 grants
Switzerland$21k · 5 grants
Ecuador$20k · 2 grants
Australia$10k · 1 grant
Germany$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 39 repeat orgs$6.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
60

Total granted

$5.3M
$5.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+19%

Still filing today

13%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $387k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Bucknell University
    5× · 2018–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +34%
  • RC
    RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +38%
  • SW
    SO WHAT ELSE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue ×20

Funded once

  • SC
    Stichting Collective Israel Actie
    one grant, 2018 · $1.7M
  • C(
    CIA (Stichting Collectieve Israel Actie)
    one grant, 2019 · $1.2M
  • C(
    CIA (Stichting Collective Israel Actie)
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Princeton International School of Mathematics and Science Inc

The purpose of the school is to promote, advance and sponsor charitable and educational activities.

Education
2
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
3
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
4
The Bolles School

The bolles school prepares students for college and life by inspiring excellence, courage, integrity and compassion in an academic community dedicated to nurturing mind, body and soul.

Education
5
The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc

Rippowam Cisqua School creates independent thinkers, confident communicators, and engaged leaders who respect and contribute meaningfully to a diverse and increasingly complex global society.

Education
6
Woodward Academy Inc

Woodward academy provides college preparatory education for students in pre-k through grade 12. woodward intentionally brings together students from diverse backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences, creating a richer learning community…

Education
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
The Ideal School of Manhattan

An independent school providing a comprehensive educational program for children from K through 12th grade.

Education
9
Rollins College

Education and Public Service Mission: Rollins College educates students for global citizenship and responsible leadership, empowering graduates to pursue meaningful lives and productive careers. We are committed to liberal arts ethos and…

Education
10
Phoenix International Incorporated

PISOTA offers students an arts and international-focused school with an innovative, whole-child approach, which prepares young people for leadership in a global and creative world.

—
11
Crossroads School for Arts and Sciences

Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.

Education
12
Tucson International School Inc

To provide internationally based and grounded instructional programs to children from infancy through middle school.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverdale Country School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Collective Israel Actie (CIA) - Weizmann Ekard Institute Cancer Research: $2,804,449 · OtherCollective Israel Actie (CIA) - Weizmann Ekard Institute Cancer ResearchStichting Collective Israel Actie: $1,731,300 · OtherStichting Collective Israel ActieCIA (Stichting Collectieve Israel Actie): $1,238,411 · OtherCIA (Stichting Collectieve Israel Actie)CIA (Stichting Collective Israel Actie): $1,050,000 · OtherCIA (Stichting Collective Israel Actie)CIA (Stichting Collective Israel Actie) Weizmann Ekard Inst Cancer Research: $1,000,000 · OtherCIA (Stichting Collective Israel Actie) Weizmann Ekard Inst Cancer ResearchCollective Israel Actie (CIA) - Theatres: $337,600 · Other+90 more: $1,709,784 · Other+90 moreBucknell University: $1,250,000 · EducationBucknell Uni…+1 more: $17,500 · EducationStepping Stones Wilderness Initiati: $302,643 · Public BenefitREACHING U A FOUNDATION FOR URUGUAY: $84,000 · International+1 more: $2,400 · InternationalPolo Cares Inc: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsFILM INDEPENDENT: $11,073 · Arts & CultureSO WHAT ELSE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · Health
Other$9,871,544Education$1,267,500Public Benefit$302,643International$86,400Recreation & Sports$15,000Arts & Culture$11,073Philanthropy$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBucknell University: $1,250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetStepping Stones Wilderness Initiati: $302,643 over 1y, 98% of budgetREACHING U A FOUNDATION FOR URUGUAY: $84,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetThe Orme School: $60,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPolo Cares Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetPROJECT CHANGE: $15,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT: $11,073 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSO WHAT ELSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds Stepping Stones Wilderness Initiati ↗
  • Who funds REACHING U A FOUNDATION FOR URUGUAY ↗
  • Who funds The Orme School ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Polo Cares Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robben Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robben Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robben Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Robben Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robben’s filings →

    More from the funding graph