Skip to content

· Public charity

Rivervalley Consulting Services Inc

To offer consulting services to related non-profit entities.

$106k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Human Services$80kPhilanthropy$28kCrime & Legal$20kHealth$10k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $85,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $105,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,950 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$17,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INC$57,500
UNITED WAY OF THE OHIO VALLEY$17,500
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE OWENSBORO$10,000
02Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls On the Run of Central Ohio

We inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.

Youth Development
2
United Way of Central Kentucky Inc

To improve lives by providing support through funding local agenies and performing community growth activities.

Human Services
3
Owensboro Museum of Fine Art Inc

Operate and maintain an art museum located in owensboro, kentucky and to actively assist and support the visual arts in owensboro and the surrounding areas.

Arts & Culture
4
Girls On the Run of Greater Cincinn

The mission of GOTR is to inspire girls to be joyful,healthy,confident using fun experience based curriculum,creatively integrates running

Youth Development
5
United Way of Northeast Kentucky

Solicit Funds for Charitable and Civic Work

Philanthropy
6
Girls On the Run Central Kentucky Corporation

The girls on the run researched-based curriculum is structured around understanding ourselves, valuing relationships and teamwork, and recognizing how we can shape the world at large. participants gain critical life skills that strengthen…

Education
7
Kentucky Thoroughbred Owners & Breeders Inc

To advertise, foster and promote the thoroughbred horse industry in the commonwealth of kentucky

—
8
Girls On the Run Mid State Pa

The mission of the organization is to inspire girls to be joyful, healthy, and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running. we envision a world where every girl knows and activates her limitless…

Youth Development
9
Girls On the Run of Dayton

Character development program for youth girls; to inspire them to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.

Youth Development
10
Owensboro Health Inc

Owensboro health, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
11
Girls On the Run of Northwest Ohio

To inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum that creatively integrates running.

Recreation & Sports
12
Owensboro Health Medical Group Inc

Owensboro health medical group, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Owensboro-Dav County; the most unlike its peers is Dream Riders of Kentucky Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesDREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INCUNITED WAY: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAYFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE #16 OWENSBORO LODGE: $10,000 · OtherFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE #16 OW…DAVIESS COUNTY FISCAL COURT: $10,000 · OtherDAVIESS COUNTY FISCAL COURTDAVIESS COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH COURT: $10,000 · OtherDAVIESS COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH COU…UNITED WAY OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …
Human Services$80,000Other$40,000Philanthropy$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INC: $80,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $17,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE #16 OWENSBORO LODGE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lawrence & Augusta Hager Educational Foundation IncKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lawrence & Augusta Hager Educational Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rivervalley Consulting Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rivervalley Consulting Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    03Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rivervalley Consulting Services Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rivervalley Consulting Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $74k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rivervalley Consulting Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph