· Public charity
Riverside Arts Council
The promotion of the arts and cultural life in the city and county of Riverside, California.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $252,743 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $295,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,357 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIVERSIDE ART MUSEUM | $59,500 |
| RIVERSIDE COUNTY PHILHARMONIC | $50,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UC-RIVERSIDE | $26,000 |
| PERFORMANCE RIVERSIDE | $21,500 |
| MARCH FIELD AIR MUSEUM | $20,750 |
| RIVERSIDE DICKENS FESTIVAL | $20,000 |
| RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY PLAYERS | $18,000 |
| INLANDIA INSTITUTE | $17,500 |
| BALLET FOLKLORIO DE RIVERSIDE | $12,000 |
| RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY ARTS | $7,493 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage the learning and enjoyment of fine art in the community by the use of art classes, demonstrations, seminars, exhibits, and lectures to the community regarding various types of fine art.
Education in the performing and visual arts.
Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.
To create community theatre productions
The promotion of the arts and cultural life in the city and county of Riverside, California.
The organization partnered with the riverside art museum to stage events at the cheech marin center for chicano art & culture.
The Riverside Childrens Theatre is a Drama School for the youth and conduct theatrical performances during the year for the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverside Community Arts Association and the most unlike its peers is March Field Museum Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIVERSIDE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY PHILHARMONIC ASSN INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARCH FIELD MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE DICKENS FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY PLAYERS ↗
- Who funds INLANDIA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Ballet Folklorico De Riverside ↗
- Who funds Riverside Community Arts Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Riverside Arts Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.