Skip to content

· Private foundation

River City Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$102kEnvironment$54kRecreation & Sports$23kCommunity Improvement$12kHousing & Shelter$3kHealth$1kHuman Services$300
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $91k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSCO SHIFT INC$90,882
HIDDEN VALLEY -RCO CHILDREN'S SKI C$7,486
FRIENDS OF CARONDELET PARK$2,500
MISSOURI WHITEWATER ASSOCIATION$2,000
CHAIN OF ROCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LINKSTL INC: $300 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of River City Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 91%.

River City Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joplin Trails Coalition Inc

The Joplin Trails Coalition is a non-profit organization dedicated to creating and maintaining multi-use trails in Joplin, Webb City, Carthage, Oronogo and Carl Junction Missouri.

Civil Rights
2
Greenway Network Inc

Greenway network is a grassroots volunteer based organization. our mission is to conserve natural resources, encourage sound management of areas watersheds and protect the quality of life for the residents of the greater st louis area.

Environment
3
Missouri Energy Initiative

Serve as a central source for new energyy information, facilitate collaboration among interested parties. Leadership role in energy science, education, training and public policy. Unbiased analysis of energy issues and workforce research.

Environment
4
Midtown Greenway Coalition

Our mission is to empower communities to develop, improve, protect, and enjoy the Midtown Greenway as a green urban corridor to improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
5
Missouri Evergreen

A membership organization to encourage resource sharing among Missouri Public Libraries; Provide, strengthen, and enhance library services through training and collaboration; Share software and technology; Provide expanded library…

Education
6
North County Inc

To promote the North St Louis County economy and community

—
7
St Louis Earth Day

To inspire and mobilize a collaborative movement towards an equitable and environmentally sustainable St Louis region every day.

Environment
8
Missouri Gateway Green Building Council

Missouri gateway green building council works collaboratively to accelerate the greening of buildings and communities in our region; promoting environmentally responsible, prosperous, healthy, and equitable places to live, work, and learn.

—
9
Midwest Sustainabilty Group

Envirnmental watchdog org.

Environment
10
Shoreline Greenway Trail Inc

To develop a recreational trail for public use.

Recreation & Sports
11
St Louis River Alliance

Promoting stewardship, providing education outreach and communication on the St Louis River Estuary Area of Concern Project

Environment
12
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Linkstl Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSCO SHIFT INC: $90,882 · EducationHOSCO SHIFT INCGROWING FEED GROWING PEOPLE INC: $50,000 · OtherGROWING FEED GROWING PEOPLE INCHIDDEN VALLEY -RCO CHILDREN'S SKI C: $13,363 · OtherHIDDEN VALLEY -RCO CHILDREN'S SKI CIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+11 more: $14,750 · Other+11 moreGREAT RIVERS GREENWAY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTRAILNET INC: $4,308 · Recreation & SportsMissouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation: $3,787 · EnvironmentNORTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $2,750 · Housing & ShelterLINKSTL INC: $300 · Human ServicesRECREATION COUNCIL OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $250 · Civil Rights
Education$90,882Other$83,113Community Improvement$10,000Recreation & Sports$4,308Environment$3,787Housing & Shelter$2,750Human Services$300Civil Rights$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSCO SHIFT INC: $90,882 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetGREAT RIVERS GREENWAY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRAILNET INC: $4,308 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMissouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation: $3,787 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $2,750 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetMISSOURI ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLINKSTL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRECREATION COUNCIL OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSCO SHIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVERS GREENWAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRAILNET INC ↗
  • Who funds Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LINKSTL INC ↗
  • Who funds RECREATION COUNCIL OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · William a Kerr Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization River City Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from River City Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to River City Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to River City Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on River City’s filings →

    More from the funding graph