Skip to content
River City Construction Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

River City Construction Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$30kCommunity Improvement$25kEmployment$23kRecreation & Sports$15kPhilanthropy$15kEducation$8kHuman Services$4kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,829
Median grant
4
States reached
$531k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANSDOWNE UP$12,375
RIVER CITY HABITAT MO$7,500
OLYMPIA HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
WASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
PEKIN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
MIDWEST CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
WOODRUFF CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER$3,829
ELMWOOD HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
METAMORA TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
ILLINOIS VALLEY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$3,829
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNITED WAY SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN WALBRIDGE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASPCA WALBRIDGE: $1k → 17%FREEDOM RIVER WALBRIDGE: $3k → 5%FREEDOM RIVER INC: $15k → 14%UNITED WAY SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN WALBRIDGE: $2k → 21%RIVER CITY HABITAT MO: $8k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $400 → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 17%METAMORA TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 7%PEKIN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 9%OLYMPIA HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 11%OSF FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%LANSDOWNE UP: $13k → 16%MIDWEST CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 9%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $13k → 14%LANSDOWNE UP: $12k → 16%BILLIE FARRIS: $500 → 9%WOODRUFF CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER: $4k → 14%WASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 9%ILLINOIS VALLEY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%ELMWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSF FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherOSF FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYRIVER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,500 · OtherRIVER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYOLYMPIA HIGH SCHOOL: $3,829 · OtherOLYMPIA HIGH SCHOOLWASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $3,829 · OtherWASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOLELMWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $3,829 · OtherELMWOOD HIGH SCHOOLMIDWEST CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $3,829 · OtherMIDWEST CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOLPEKIN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $3,829 · OtherPEKIN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOLILLINOIS VALLEY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $3,829 · OtherILLINOIS VALLEY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOLWOODRUFF CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER: $3,829 · OtherWOODRUFF CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTERCOUNTY OF WOODFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 122: $3,829 · OtherCOUNTY OF WOODFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 122Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+7 more: $7,000 · Other+7 moreLANSDOWNE UP: $24,875 · Community ImprovementLANSDOWNE UPNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATIONFREEDOM RIVER INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitFREEDOM RIVER…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $400 · Philanthropy
Other$70,132Community Improvement$37,375Public Benefit$15,000Philanthropy$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANSDOWNE UP: $24,875 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM RIVER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRIVER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANSDOWNE UP ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization River City Construction Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from River City Construction Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on River City Construction’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home