· Private foundation
Risk Management Association Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k68 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TULSA | $41,000 |
| BRYANT UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| LIVINGSTONE COLLEGE | $18,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
93 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 85 since wound down; 64 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2019–2020 · $7k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2018–2019 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2019–2020 · $6k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 816 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Risk Management Association Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Risk Management Association Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The University of Tulsa: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Risk Management Association’s filings →