Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rise Up Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$761kHealth$25kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$22kHuman Services$8kPublic Benefit$7kFood & Nutrition$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$8,837
Median grant
1
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Y'ALL WEST$10,000
DONORS CHOOSE$8,837
CITY OF ORANGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $97) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED: $97 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
WV
NC
SC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 11 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
52

Total granted

$607k
$440k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+25%

Still filing today

18%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Fairmont Prep Academy
    5× · 2018–2022 · $291k
  • DC
    DONORS CHOOSE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $102k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $84k

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BOOK
    one grant, 2019 · $225k · revenue -3%
  • 1Y
    10 yEAR CELEBRATION LITERACY GRANTS
    one grant, 2018 · $72k
  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    one grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Read

Building bright futures through literacy, digital skills, math, and conversation.

Education
2
Kidsmart Inc

Kidsmart empowers kids in need to succeed in school by providing free essential tools for learning.

Education
3
River Springs Charter School Inc

Our mission is to foster the innate curiosity of our students, empower their parents, and promote optimum learning by collaboratively developing a personalized learning program for each student.

Education
4
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
5
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
6
Kids Need to Read

Kids need to read helps children to discover the joy of reading and the power of a literate mind by providing inspiring books and literacy programs to underfunded schools, libraries, and community agencies across the united states,…

Education
7
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
8
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
9
Innovate Public Schools

Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.

Philanthropy
10
South Sutter Charter School

South sutter charter school is an independent study charter school that provides a voluntary public educational choice for families of students who choose to educate their children in the home environment.

Education
11
Go Public Schools

GO Public Schools builds and supports a multi-city network of local coalitions, whose members parents, educators, and community allies work together to expand access to quality education in Californias most historically underserved…

Education
12
Between the Pages

Between the pages empowers children to discover a life-long love of reading using books as tools to immerse economically disadvantaged and avid readers in an engaging recreation of their favorite books, fostering literacy, creative play,…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Someone Cares Soup Kitchen; the most unlike its peers is Reading Is Fundamental Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fairmont Prep Academy: $291,429 · OtherFairmont Prep AcademyDONORS CHOOSE: $101,523 · OtherDONORS CHOOSEIndividual grant recipient: $84,011 · OtherIndividual grant recipient10 yEAR CELEBRATION LITERACY GRANTS: $71,985 · Other10 yEAR CELEBRATION LITERACY GRANTSVarious K-12 Public and Private Schools: $48,579 · OtherVarious K-12 Public and Private SchoolsCHOC Hospital: $25,000 · Other+50 more: $110,409 · Other+50 moreFIRST BOOK: $225,000 · EducationFIRST BOOKREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $34,025 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INCDONORSCHOOSEORG: $26,774 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGYALLWEST: $22,000 · EducationYALLWEST+2 more: $6,000 · EducationServing People In Need Inc: $97 · Human Services
Other$732,936Education$313,799Human Services$97

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIRST BOOK: $225,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $34,025 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $26,774 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYALLWEST: $22,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetGIRLS WRITE NOW INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWakefield Elementary PTA: $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSpectrum Academy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFosterHope Sacramento: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetServing People In Need Inc: $97 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds YALLWEST ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WRITE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds Wakefield Elementary PTA ↗
  • Who funds Spectrum Academy ↗
  • Who funds SOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rise Up Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rise Up Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rise Up’s filings →

    More from the funding graph