Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rio-South Texas Education and Community Development Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to ensure residents acquire skills and knowledge and have access to economic opportunities to pursue meaningful careers and live prosperous lives in rio south texas.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$5.7MScience & Tech$750kArts & Culture$50kEmployment$35kPublic Benefit$23kYouth Development$22kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $610k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.8M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY$1,000,000
SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$250,000
TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$250,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$250,000
THE TSTC FOUNDATION$200,000
THE TSTC FOUNDATION$150,000
LCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$132,515
VALLEY GRANDE INSTITUTE$127,000
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD$25,000
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD$10,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%IBAT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $23k → 10%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $5k → 14%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $250k → 21%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $250k → 22%THE TSTC FOUNDATION: $900k → 23%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $1.5M → 27%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $750k → 21%THE TSTC FOUNDATION: $310k → 23%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $1.0M → 27%LCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $133k → 21%THE TSTC FOUNDATION: $200k → 23%SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250k → 27%LCC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $125k → 21%THE TSTC FOUNDATION: $150k → 23%LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $25k → 27%THE IMAGINARIUM OF SOUTH TEXAS: $50k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MCALLEN: $22k → 27%LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $10k → 27%VAMOS: $10k → 27%VALLEY GRANDE INSTITUTE: $127k → 27%ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $25k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 4 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$4.8M
$880k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+28%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $912k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEmploymentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2.5M
  • THE TSTC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +61%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $443k

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $750k
  • LC
    LAREDO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -29%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lamar State College Port Arthur Foundation

The mission of the Lamar State College Port Arthur Foundation is to promote advance support encourage sponsor aid and advocate solely for Lamar State College Port Arthur.

Human Services
2
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
3
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
4
West Texas a&M Univ Foundation

The foundation supports west texas a&m university, an institution of higher education, and the students of wtamu by receiving and administering gifts from the public.

Education
5
Lamar University Foundation Inc

The Foundation supports the development and promotion of Lamar University, its students, faculty and staff. The Lamar University Foundation supports and enhances Lamar University by encouraging the commitment of personal and financial…

Education
6
Texas a&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc

The Foundation was formed to be a vital partner with Texas A&M University-Kingsville by developing donor relationships and linking resources in the pursuit of the University's goals of excellence.Values: Service to the University and the…

Education
7
Midwestern State University Foundation Inc

To receive contributions by means of donations, gifts, and bequests and to expend such funds for the advancement of the literary, scientific, and other educational endeavors of Midwestern State University, a tax exempt institution of…

Education
8
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
9
Western Texas College Foundation

The western texas college foundation serves western texas college by soliciting, receiving, and administering gifts and grants for student scholarships, educational and cultural activities, and campus facility improvement and development.

Education
10
Laredo Area Community Foundation

To inspire by generosity and empower by a legacy of giving, the Laredo Area Community Foundation provides for the philanthropic needs of Laredo and surrounding communities.

Philanthropy
11
Lake Travis Education Foundation

Support Teachers and Students with Grants and Scholarships

—
12
Texas State University Development Foundation

To support and further the mission of texas state university through the acceptance and investment of gifts established as endowments benefiting the students, faculty and staff.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Texas Am International University Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $2,500,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEYTEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $750,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE: $443,402 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGESOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION+4 more: $184,000 · OtherTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $1,560,254 · EducationTHE TSTC FOUNDATIONLaredo College Education Foundation: $257,515 · EducationLaredo College Education FoundationTexas A&M Foundation: $250,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationTexas AM International University Alumni Association: $250,000 · EducationTexas AM International University Alumni…LAREDO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $35,000 · EmploymentMAIN STREET FOUNDATION: $23,000 · Public BenefitCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,127,402Education$2,317,769Arts & Culture$50,000Employment$35,000Public Benefit$23,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $1,560,254 over 3y, 21% of budgetLaredo College Education Foundation: $257,515 over 2y, 32% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAREDO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc: $22,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Electric Power FoundationDE15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Electric Power Foundation · BBVA Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rio-South Texas Education and Community Development Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rio-South Texas Education and Community Development Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rio-South Texas Education and Community Development Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rio-South Texas Education and Community Development Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rio-South Texas Education and Community Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph