Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richchar Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$227kHealth$185kHousing & Shelter$148kInternational$84kFood & Nutrition$69kArts & Culture$61kCivil Rights$30kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$282k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Housing Forward$85,000
St Ignatius College Prep$25,000
Partners in Health$15,000
WBEZ Chicago Public Media$15,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$15,000
Michael J Fox Foundation$12,500
The Barack Obama Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Journey Care: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Richchar Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Richchar Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 14 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -96% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$775k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-96%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOUSING FORWARD
    8× · 2018–2025 · $148k · revenue +189%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $84k · revenue +91%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $78k · revenue +479%

Funded once

  • EI
    Elea Institute
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -96%
  • AC
    American Cancer Society
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Public Health Innovation

Iphi develops multi-sector partnerships and innovative solutions to improve the public's health and well-being across maryland, virginia and the district of columbia. our work strengthens health systems and policy, enhances conditions that…

Human Services
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
4
The Carle Foundation Hospital

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
5
College of American Pathologists Foundation

Champion humanitarian & patient-centered roles for pathologists. connect those in need to the specialized, life savings skills of pathologists. confer training & awards to residents.

Education
6
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Parkinson's Foundation Inc

Make life better for people with parkinson's disease by improving care and advancing research toward a cure.

Health
11
Chapin Hall Center for Children

Chapin hall's mission is to improve the well-being of children and youth, families, and their communities through broad-perspective policy research.

Human Services
12
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Public Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Ignatius College Prep: $160,000 · OtherSt Ignatius College PrepThe V Foundation For Cancer Researc: $60,000 · OtherThe V Foundation For Cancer ResearcLOYOLA ACADEMY: $27,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYNetwork Advocates Nuns on the Bus: $20,000 · OtherNetwork Advocates Nuns on the BusCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $19,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCAmerican Cancer Society: $12,500 · OtherChicago Food Depository: $11,500 · Other+4 more: $28,500 · Other+4 morePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $83,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A N…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $77,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUN…HOUSING FORWARD: $147,500 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FORWARDCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $61,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $48,500 · Food & NutritionLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $30,000 · EducationThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $20,000 · ReligionElea Institute: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$339,000Health$161,000Housing & Shelter$147,500Arts & Culture$62,000Food & Nutrition$48,500Education$30,000Religion$20,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $147,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $83,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $77,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $61,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $48,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetElea Institute: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds Elea Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richchar Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richchar Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richchar Inc?

Find your warmest path to Richchar Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richchar’s filings →

More from the funding graph