Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richards Brandt Miller Nelson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$42kCrime & Legal$28kHealth$28kHousing & Shelter$19kHuman Services$14kEducation$500
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,316
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH FOOD BANK$5,000
FOURTH STREET CLINIC$5,000
CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER$1,316
GRANDVIEW FOR GOOD$1,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $5k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $4k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $1k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $1k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $1k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $750 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $7k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $3k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $750 → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $1k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 9 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$130k
$500

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +93%
  • WH
    Wasatch Homeless Health Care
    8× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +94%
  • TR
    THE ROAD HOME
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • BF
    BROCKSTRONG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Utah Domestic Violence Legal Services

Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.

Crime & Legal
3
Peoples Legal Aid

People's Legal Aid is a non-profit legal organization providing free civil legal education, assistance and representation to any Utahn facing eviction and debt collections lawsuits.

Crime & Legal
4
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

—
5
Utah Regional Housing Corporation

Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.

Housing & Shelter
6
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
7
Central Utah Food Sharing

Food bank - to assist those families who face the dilemma of paying rent or buying food.

—
8
Clean Slate Utah

To help people clear their criminal records and access opportunities. we will do this by: 1) spreading the word about utah's clean slate law to individuals with records, so they are aware of the law and its positive impact on their lives;…

Crime & Legal
9
Northeastern Utah Friends Against Family Violence

Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…

Health
10
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
11
Utah Crime Victim Legal Clinic Inc

Provides free legal representation for victims of crime including providing information, support, and advocacy for victims as they go through the criminal justice process.

Human Services
12
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is And Justice for All; the most unlike its peers is The Road Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK: $42,120 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKWHEELS OF JUSTICE: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $2,800 · Other+3 moreTHE ROAD HOME: $17,250 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOMECrossroads Urban Center: $13,066 · Human ServicesCrossroads Urban CenterTHE INN BETWEEN: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE INN BETWEENWasatch Homeless Health Care: $26,750 · HealthWasatch Homeless Healt…AND JUSTICE FOR ALL: $15,000 · Crime & LegalAND JUSTICE FOR ALLLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE: $11,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF S…
Other$46,920Human Services$32,316Health$26,750Crime & Legal$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $42,120 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care: $26,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $17,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAND JUSTICE FOR ALL: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCrossroads Urban Center: $13,066 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE: $11,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds AND JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds Crossroads Urban Center ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dominion Energy Charitable FoundationVA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Castle Foundation Co Greg Phillips · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Smartgo Foundation · Herbert I & Elsa B Michael Foundation US Bank National Association · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Utah's Promise · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richards Brandt Miller Nelson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richards Brandt Miller Nelson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richards Brandt Miller Nelson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richards Brandt Miller Nelson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richards Brandt Miller Nelson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph