Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard W and Theresa R Barch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$789kAnimals$78kEnvironment$69kCrime & Legal$20kPublic Benefit$13kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$661k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
MI TROUT UNLIMITED$10,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$5,000
LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $5k → 11%BONEFISH TARPON TRUSTS: $5k → 15%MI TROUT UNLIMITED: $10k → 9%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $500k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $99k → 14%TROUT UNLIMITED: $6k → 14%MICHIGAN SPORTSMEN ALLIANCE: $1k → 15%MICHIGAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $13k → 16%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $12k → 17%USA SHOOTING: $170 → 9%SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE: $1k → 15%NRA FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%TROUT UNLIMITED: $3k → 7%ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION: $10k → 16%RUFFLED FROUSE: $3k → 11%BONEFISH TARPON TRUST: $5k → 15%MICHIGAN TROUT UNLIMITED: $5k → 9%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN TROUT UNLIMITED: $3k → 14%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $11k → 17%NRA FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION: $10k → 16%RUFFED GROUSE: $3k → 11%BONEFISH TARPON TRUSTS: $5k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $62k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%TROUT UNLIMITED: $3k → 14%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $10k → 17%ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION: $10k → 16%BONEFISH TARPON TRUSTS: $5k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5k → 14%TROUT UNLIMITED: $3k → 14%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $10k → 17%ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION: $10k → 16%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%TROUT UNLIMITED: $2k → 14%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $940 → 17%LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%TROUT UNLIMITED GRIFFITH: $2k → 14%TROUT UNLIMITED AQUIFER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
OH
PA
CO
VA
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$811k · 6 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$811k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $44k · revenue +99%
  • Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $41k · revenue +375%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • ML
    MICHIGAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -26%
  • RG
    RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ducks Unlimited Inc Group Return

Ducks unlimited, inc. conserves, restores, and manages wetlands and associated habitats for north america's waterfowl. these habitats also benefit additional wildlife and people.

Environment
2
Ruffed Grouse Society Group Return

Established in 1961, the ruffed grouse society unites conservationists to improve wildlife habitat and forest health and promote a conservation ethic, all grounded in the tenets of science-based management practices.

Environment
3
Wild Salmon Rivers

To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…

Environment
4
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
5
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
6
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
7
Montana Trout Unlimited

To conserve, protect and restore montana's coldwater fisheries and watersheds.

Recreation & Sports
8
Richland Creek Top Guns
Recreation & Sports
9
Colorado Trout Unlimited

To conserve, protect and restore colorado's coldwater fisheries and their watersheds.

Animals
10
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ducks Unlimited Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY: $669,740 · OtherLAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY+10 more: $49,370 · Other+10 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $119,044 · EducationHILLSDALE COL…Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc: $40,675 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL: $21,500 · AnimalsBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $3,000 · AnimalsDucks Unlimited Inc: $43,840 · EnvironmentRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $5,000 · EnvironmentNRA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$719,110Education$119,044Animals$70,175Environment$48,840Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $119,044 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $43,840 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc: $40,675 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL: $21,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetNRA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA Shooting Inc: $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED MICHIGAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NRA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds USA Shooting Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard W and Theresa R Barch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard W and Theresa R Barch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard W and Theresa R Barch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph