Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard James Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$65kFood & Nutrition$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kHuman Services$25kHousing & Shelter$22kArts & Culture$13kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$549k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STROUD FOOD PANTRY$4,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,000
OUR DAILY BREAD$3,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$3,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$3,000
MAYFLOWER CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$3,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$2,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
OU FOUNDATION$1,500
LINCOLN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $4k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $600 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Richard James Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 97%.

Richard James Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 16 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$216k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

44%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthFood & NutritionEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Stroud Food Pantry Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +35%
  • CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +111%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2018–2022 · $18k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SC
    STROUD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
—
2
Oklahoma Blood Institute

Oklahoma blood institute's (obi) mission is to be the donor-to-patient lifeline by providing our communities and medical partners security by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health
3
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
5
Regional Food Bank Foundation

The primary mission of the organization is to provide support to and manage the investments of the regional food bank of oklahoma, inc.

Food & Nutrition
6
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
8
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
9
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
10
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
11
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tillman County Food Bank Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $34,500 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $24,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMAYFLOWER CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $19,700 · OtherMAYFLOWER CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHAMERICAN RED CROSS: $13,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSOUR DAILY BREAD FOOD RESOURCE CENTE: $10,700 · OtherOUR DAILY BREAD FOOD RESOURCE CENTESTROUD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherSTROUD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCOUR DAILY BREAD: $8,000 · OtherOUR DAILY BREADOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $6,500 · OtherSTROUD HIGH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $11,500 · Other+6 moreCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $21,600 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSIO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National …Stroud Food Pantry Inc: $34,000 · Food & NutritionStroud Food Pant…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 · ReligionOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $4,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$149,400Human Services$39,600Food & Nutrition$34,000Religion$6,000Health$4,000Education$3,000Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStroud Food Pantry Inc: $34,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $21,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTILLMAN COUNTY FOOD BANK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Stroud Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TILLMAN COUNTY FOOD BANK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard James Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard James Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard James Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph