Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard & Lisa Soultanian Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$163kReligion$27kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$13kCivil Rights$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kInternational$10kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$588k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY$10,000
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY FUND$5,000
THE PINGRY SCHOOL$5,000
ST LEONS ARMENIAN CHURCH$2,750
DEVILS YOUTH FOUNDATION$2,000
LOAVES AND FISHES$1,500
NYU$1,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
NOURISH NJ$1,000
ST JUDES MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
BERNARDS TOWNSHIP LIBRARY$500
FRIENDS OF BERNARDS LIBRARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%THE SEEING EYE: $1k → 4%THE SEEING EYE: $1k → 4%THE SEEING EYE: $500 → 4%THE SEEING EYE: $500 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 31 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
10

Total granted

$264k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+59%

Still filing today

39%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Bucknell University
    7× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +34%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • WF
    WAKE FORREST LAW FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • LS
    LEGAL SERVICES OF NJ
    one grant, 2022 · $750
  • SF
    SARCOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKE FOREST LAW SCHOOL: $90,500 · OtherWAKE FOREST LAW SCHOOLST LEON ARMENIAN CHURCH: $23,900 · OtherST LEON ARMENIAN CHURCHTHE PINGRY SCHOOL: $23,000 · OtherTHE PINGRY SCHOOLWAKE FORREST LAW FUND: $10,000 · OtherNYU: $8,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · Other+23 more: $42,800 · Other+23 moreBucknell University: $33,000 · EducationBucknell Unive…Emory University: $2,500 · EducationEmory Universi…FRIENDS OF THE BERNARDS TOWNSHIP LIBRARY: $1,850 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,250 · InternationalFeeding America: $6,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISHNJ INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionTHE SEEING EYE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE MORRIS MUSEUM INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureDEVILS YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$206,300Education$37,850International$14,250Food & Nutrition$12,500Human Services$6,000Arts & Culture$4,500Health$3,100Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBucknell University: $33,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORRIS MUSEUM INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BERNARDS TOWNSHIP LIBRARY: $1,850 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew York University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHNJ INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds THE MORRIS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds DEVILS YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BERNARDS TOWNSHIP LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard & Lisa Soultanian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard & Lisa Soultanian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Nourishnj Inc: 27% of income from government
  • The Morris Museum Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard & Lisa Soultanian’s filings →

More from the funding graph