Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
36%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$200
Largest grant, FY2025
$46,710
Organizations funded a year
9 to 17
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$107k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 36% of the organizations Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterEnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$56k36%
FY202414$45k36%
FY202312$41k33%
FY202212$33k17%
FY202115$28k47%
FY20209$25k22%
FY201917$25k41%
FY201811$30k55%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$242kPhilanthropy$38kFood & Nutrition$7kHousing & Shelter$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kEducation$1kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
IN
CA
NE
KY
WV
AZ
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 24 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 24 recipients with no EIN on record ($249k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Greater Knoxvilleinc: $38,175 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee: $6,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKnox Area Rescue Ministries Inc: $2,251 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKnoxville Habitat for Humanity Inc: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMission of Hope: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Knoxville Inc: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Smoky Mountain Council 557 Boy Scouts of America Trust: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Humane Society: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalmetto Community Health Care: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEast Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Arbor Day Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIjams Nature Center Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSacred Ground Hospice House: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKnoxville Leadership Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKnoxville Museum of Art: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Federation of America Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos de Las Americas Tucson Chapter Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEvansville Rescue Mission Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bill and Crissy Haslam FoundationTN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bill and Crissy Haslam Foundation · The Clayton Homes Foundation · Haslam Family Foundation Inc · The Clayton Family Foundation · Stowers Machinery Foundation Inc · Regal Foundation · Pya Foundation · University Health System Inc · Lawson Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · East Tennessee Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016?

Find your warmest path to Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016

How much does Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 give?
Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 reported 11 grants totaling $56,085 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 17 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (80%), Philanthropy (13%), Food & Nutrition (2%).
Who are Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: United Way of Greater Knoxvilleinc ($38k), Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee ($7k), Knox Area Rescue Ministries Inc ($2k).
Does Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Bill and Crissy Haslam Foundation, The Clayton Homes Foundation, Haslam Family Foundation Inc.
Where is Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 based?
Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016 is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard & Janice Rawe Foundation U/A 6/7/2016’s filings →

More from the funding graph