Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard a Baker Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$159kEducation$109kHuman Services$102kHealth$62kPhilanthropy$16kInternational$15kCivil Rights$12kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$5,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$910k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$14,591
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF$10,000
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL SOUTH$8,600
A AGING ADVANTAGE$5,300
CARDINALS CARE$3,000
ROTARY CLUB OF KIRKWOOD$3,000
AMERICAN LEGION POST 156$2,370
ELIJAH MOORE DREAMERS FUND INC$2,000
LINDBERGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$1,655
KIRK CARE FOOD PANTRY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE 410 BRIDGE: $3k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $5k → 12%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $5k → 21%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$409k · 17 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$409k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+19%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF
    5× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +1%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • SM
    SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • OI
    OASIS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NN
    NATIONAL NETWORK OF STATE TEACHERS OF THE YEAR
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MP
    MARLIN PERKIN'S SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chaddock Childrens Foundation

To engage individuals in sharing their time, talent and treasure to support the programs and services of the chaddock family of organizations.

Human Services
2
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
3
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
4
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
5
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
6
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
7
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
8
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
9
City Dogs Rescue Inc

The mission of city dogs city kitties rescue is to rescue dogs and cats from high-kill shelters and adopt them to loving, permanent families in the washington, dc metropolitan area. city dogs city kitties rescue is able to accomplish this…

Animals
10
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
11
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
12
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill; the most unlike its peers is Kirkwood Theatre Guild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $74,891 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAGING ADVANTAGE INC: $70,750 · OtherAGING ADVANTAGE INCDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLSAINT LOUIS ZOO: $30,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS ZOODESMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $27,000 · OtherDESMET SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientELDER ELVES INC: $16,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOO: $15,000 · OtherOASIS INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · Other+18 more: $79,357 · Other+18 moreCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $50,000 · EducationCENTRAL INST…LINDBERGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3,655 · EducationLINDBERGH SC…HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $20,000 · AnimalsFIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 · AnimalsSUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE 410 BRIDGE INC: $3,430 · Human ServicesEDENS ARMY: $5,000 · HealthDogs For Our Brave Inc: $4,500 · Public BenefitCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $200 · Public BenefitST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$393,998Education$53,655Animals$25,000Human Services$18,430Health$5,000Public Benefit$4,700Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARAQUAD INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDENS ARMY: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDogs For Our Brave Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLINDBERGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3,655 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE 410 BRIDGE INC: $3,430 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARAQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds EDENS ARMY ↗
  • Who funds FIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
  • Who funds Dogs For Our Brave Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINDBERGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE 410 BRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds KIRKWOOD THEATRE GUILD ↗
  • Who funds FENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable FoundationMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way Worldwide · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard a Baker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard a Baker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard a Baker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard a Baker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard a Baker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph