Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rhame Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$31kHealth$23kRecreation & Sports$20kAnimals$13kArts & Culture$10kScience & Tech$5kHuman Services$5kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$396k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OAKGROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,000
LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT$2,000
TOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$1,600
CORALWOOD SCHOOL$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KATES CLUB: $2k → 13%TOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $2k → 14%KATES CLUB: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 6 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +345% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$44k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+345%
+23%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +141%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k

Funded once

  • DH
    DRUID HILLS YOUTH SPORTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +48%
  • EU
    EMORY U DEPT OF PEADIATRICS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • DM
    DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Decatur Health Resources

Decatur resources, inc. ("dhr") specializes in the treatment of medically complex, castrophically injured or critically ill patients who requires a longer hospital stay than at a traditionally acute care facility, and who require…

Education
2
Donalsonville Hospital Inc

Donalsonville hospital operates a 65-bed general acute care hospital for the community of donalsonville, georgia and surrounding areas regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
Dekalb Regional Health System Inc

Dekalb regional health system, inc. ("drhs") is organized to provide support to or for the benefit of dekalb medical center, inc. and decatur health resources, inc.

Education
4
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
5
Dayton Children's Hospital

The relentless pursuit of optimal health for every child within our reach.

Health
6
Humane Society of Hall County Inc

Helping animals and people live better...together.

Animals
7
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
8
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
9
Humane Society of South Coastal Georgia Inc

To promote the compassionate treatment of animals in our community through adoption, public spay/neuter services, sheltering and education.

Animals
10
Medcura Health Inc

Medcura health provides quality, affordable, comprehensive healthcare services that are culturally sensitive and accessible to all in metropolitan atlanta.

Health
11
Dekalb Humane Society Inc

The organization provides a safe shelter for animals until they can be adopted into a lifelong home. the organization supports local law enforcement departments in animal abuse and neglect cases, works with animal rescue groups and…

Animals
12
Good Mews Animal Foundation Inc

Good mews offers an alternative to traditional animal shelters in the metro-atlanta area by providing a limited admission haven for homeless, abused, or abandoned cats until placing them in permanent, loving homes. good mews promotes…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paws Atlanta Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Rally Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DRUID HILLS YOUTH SPORTS INC: $13,000 · OtherDRUID HILLS YOUTH SPORTS INCEMORY U DEPT OF PEADIATRICS: $10,000 · OtherEMORY U DEPT OF PEADIATRICSIndividual grant recipient: $8,932 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKESIDE HIGH SCHOOL: $6,960 · OtherLAKESIDE HIGH SCHOOLCORALWOOD SCHOOL: $6,601 · OtherCORALWOOD SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5,700 · OtherDEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTOAKGROVE ELEM SCHOOL: $5,050 · OtherOAKGROVE ELEM SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $3,090 · Other+8 more: $10,450 · Other+8 moreLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $11,800 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANI…PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED: $500 · AnimalsDEKALB MEDICAL CENTER: $7,000 · EducationCHEROKEE CHARTER ACADEMY INC: $600 · EducationRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKATE'S CLUB INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $1,600 · Human Services
Other$84,183Animals$12,300Education$7,600Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$4,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRUID HILLS YOUTH SPORTS INC: $13,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $11,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRUID HILLS YOUTH SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RALLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KATE'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEROKEE CHARTER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rhame Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rhame Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rhame Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph