Skip to content

· Public charity

Retina Research Foundation

The mission of the RETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION is to reduce retinal blindness worldwide by funding programs in research and education.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$7.2MHealth$3.9MScience & Tech$129k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $1,934,287, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,458,577 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $524,290 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $650k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $584k
  • $250k+1 grant · $700k
$45,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON$700,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$220,046
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - IRVINE (UCI)$94,954
MEEI OCULAR GENOMICS INSTITUTE HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL$90,000
UNIV OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR MI$90,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$88,883
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE$45,000
TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO (UCSF)$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH - GALVESTON$45,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$45,000
SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINIOS AT CHICAGO$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$45,000
UT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $45k → 15%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $45k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - IRVINE (UCI): $95k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH - GALVESTON: $45k → 14%UT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO: $45k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - CULLEN: $373k → 16%TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $45k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA - INSTITUTE FOR VISION RESEARCH: $45k → 15%UNIV OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR MI: $90k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $700k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $45k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $45k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 14%AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $45k → 18%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $45k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINIOS AT CHICAGO: $45k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $89k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $45k → 15%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $45k → 16%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - IRVINE (UCI): $45k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $350k → 16%TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $45k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA - INSTITUTE FOR VISION RESEARCH: $45k → 15%UNIV OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR MI: $45k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $700k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $45k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 14%AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $45k → 18%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $45k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINIOS AT CHICAGO: $45k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $45k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $45k → 15%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $45k → 16%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $45k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - CULLEN: $332k → 16%TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $45k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $640k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - CULLEN: $330k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $620k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - CULLEN: $315k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $598k → 10%MEEI OCULAR GENOMICS INSTITUTE HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $90k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - CULLEN: $312k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $595k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - CULLEN: $309k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $555k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $220k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $480k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
MA
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
KY
WV
AZ
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 24 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$11M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+50%

Still filing today

29%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +67%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $208k · revenue +63%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $208k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
6
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Kentucky Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Wisconsin Madison: $4,888,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonTEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $298,000 · OtherJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMB: $285,800 · OtherIndiana University School of Medicine: $253,000 · Other+13 more: $1,781,358 · Other+13 moreBaylor College of Medicine: $2,540,946 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $208,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $178,883 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky Research …WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $129,000 · Education+3 more: $199,000 · Education+3 moreVanderbilt University Medical Center: $208,000 · HealthFOUNDATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY INC: $135,000 · HealthSchepens Eye Research Institute Inc: $90,000 · Health
Other$7,506,158Education$3,255,829Health$433,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $2,540,946 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $208,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $208,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $178,883 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $129,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $103,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $66,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Schepens Eye Research Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanderbilt University Medical CenterTN13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanderbilt University Medical Center · University of Pittsburgh · American Heart Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Retina Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Retina Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Retina Research Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Retina Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Retina Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph