Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Resource Impact

Resource Impact tackles 21st-century social challenges by helping today's progressive leaders learn from the past, plan for the future, and execute on strategies that bring about beneficial social change.

$300k
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
11
Organizations funded FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

76% of Resource Impact’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Global Impact, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Resource Impact named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $300k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’18
2
’19
1
’22
1
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2018
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$65,800
States reached, FY2018
6
Total assets, FY2018
$5.0M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$886kCrime & Legal$743kCivil Rights$573kPhilanthropy$298kArts & Culture$61kReligion$45kEducation$39k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Freedom Reads Inc$713,367112%
Gunsdown Inc$396,997147%
Foundation to Promote Open Society$298,47020%
Latino Leadership Inc$65,80016%
Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Inc$50,00011%
Center for Popular Democracy Inc$45,00010%
Raben Group$38,8801n/a
Mi Familia En Accion$30,00011%
Latinojustice Prldef$30,00010%
Iglesia Episcopal Jesus de Nazaret$25,0001n/a
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Resource Impact by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Freedom Reads Inc$713,367112%
Gunsdown Inc$396,997147%
Foundation to Promote Open Society$298,47020%
Latino Leadership Inc$65,80016%
Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Inc$50,00011%
Center for Popular Democracy Inc$45,00010%
Raben Group$38,8801n/a
Mi Familia En Accion$30,00011%
Latinojustice Prldef$30,00010%
Iglesia Episcopal Jesus de Nazaret$25,0001n/a
Sos by Urbander Inc$20,0001n/a
Iglesia El Calvario Ag of Orlando$20,0001n/a
State Voices$15,00010%
El Paso Festivals Inc$7,5001n/a
The Blackhouse Foundation$3,00011%

Where it is load-bearing

Resource Impact supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 10 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFreedom Reads Inc: $713,367 over 1y, 12% of budgetGunsdown Inc: $396,997 over 1y, 47% of budgetFoundation to Promote Open Society: $298,470 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLatino Leadership Inc: $65,800 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCongressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Popular Democracy Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMi Familia En Accion: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLatinojustice Prldef: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetState Voices: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Blackhouse Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hispanic Federation IncNY13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Resource Impact with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Resource Impact?

Find your warmest path to Resource Impact through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Resource Impact

How much does Resource Impact give?
Resource Impact reported 11 grants totaling $300,180 in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does Resource Impact fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are International (34%), Crime & Legal (28%), Civil Rights (22%).
Who are Resource Impact's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Freedom Reads Inc ($713k), Gunsdown Inc ($397k), Foundation to Promote Open Society ($298k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Resource Impact?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hispanic Federation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Resource Impact based?
Resource Impact is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Resource Impact’s filings →

More from the funding graph