· Private foundation
Reset Ventures Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $597k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MUSKEGON LAKESHORE | $300,000 |
| JANDERNOA ENTREPRENEURIAL MENTORING | $150,000 |
| TRINITY HEALTH | $110,000 |
| MUSKEGON MUSEUM OF ART | $106,000 |
| HACKLEY AND HUME HISTORIC SITE | $90,000 |
| FRAUENTHAL CENTER | $80,000 |
| MUSKEGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $61,000 |
| WEST MICHIGAN SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| DETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LIVING WORD CHURCH | $4,000 |
| REETHS PUFFER BOARD OF EDUCATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $176k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION2× · 2023–2024 · $220k · revenue +25%
- JEJANDERNOA ENTREPRENEURIAL MENTORING2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +9% · 42% of their budget
- GMGREATER MUSKEGON WOMANS CLUB2× · 2021–2022 · $113k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- MHMERCY HEALTH PARTNERSone grant, 2022 · $110k · revenue +11%
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MUSKEGEON FRAUENTHALone grant, 2022 · $80k
- AHAmerican Hospital Associationone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Member programs/services, economic development
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. muskegon community health project is a member of mercy health and trinity health.
1) to plan and conduct nonpartisan public education programs regarding free enterprise, productivity and basic economic issues affecting the state of michigan.2) to establish and operate a leadership institute designed to provide promising…
To showcase michigan as a premier digital hub - attracting, developing, and retaining top tech talent across industries, while simultaneously enhancing the growth and vitality of our state and the economy.
Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.
Creating healthy communities - together
We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.
Creating healthy communities - together
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Muskegon County and the most unlike its peers is Northend Christian Community Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MUSKEGON LAKESHORE ↗
- Who funds TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JANDERNOA ENTREPRENEURIAL MENTORING ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GREATER MUSKEGON WOMANS CLUB ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Northend Christian Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds American Hospital Association ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds Avalon Village Inc ↗
- Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
- Who funds MUSKEGON LAKESHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE LEGACY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TALENTFIRST INC FKA TALENT FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHANCE FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MUSKEGON COUNTY INC D/B/A HARBOR HOSPICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Dte Energy Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Howmet Aerospace Foundation · Frey Foundation · Fremont Area Community Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · The Paul C Johnson Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reset Ventures Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.