Skip to content
Repair the World at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Repair the World

REPAIR THE WORLD mobilizes jews and their communities to take action to pursue a more just world, igniting a lifelong commitment to service.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$438k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.7MPhilanthropy$430kHuman Services$258kCivil Rights$148kYouth Development$120k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $1,071,565, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,515,236 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,443,671 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $594k
  • $250k+1 grant · $438k
$95,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$437,721
MOISHE HOUSE$146,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA$135,000
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$95,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC FOR JDC ENTWINE$87,117
HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC$70,727
B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION$60,000
ALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $258k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $135k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $123k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $930k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$930k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FISCAL SPONSORSHIP SERVICES UNDER AN MOU WHICH INCLUDES ALL FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND EMPLOYMENT OF US BASED STAFF

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    4× · 2017–2025 · $996k · revenue +42%
  • TO
    THE ONE AMERICA MOVEMENT
    2× · 2020–2021 · $148k · revenue +162%
  • AE
    ALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +13%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Jewish Agency for Israel

    The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

    —
    2
    Connect Israel

    Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

    International
    3
    Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
    —
    4
    American Jewish Committee

    AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

    Civil Rights
    5
    Young Judaea Global Inc

    Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

    Education
    6
    Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
    Philanthropy
    7
    National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
    —
    8
    Israeli-American Council

    The organization's mission is to build an engaged and united israeli-american community that strengthens the israeli and jewish identity of our next generation, the american-jewish community and the bond between the peoples of the united…

    Human Services
    9
    Joint Israel

    To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

    International
    10
    University of Judaism Foundation
    —
    11
    Dorot Foundation
    Philanthropy
    12
    Minneapolis Jewish Federation

    Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

    Philanthropy
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc; the most unlike its peers is The One America Movement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    3/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $995,844 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFEMOISHE HOUSE: $292,000 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSETHE ONE AMERICA MOVEMENT: $148,220 · ReligionTHE ONE AMERICA MOVEMENTHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $139,394 · ReligionHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INCTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC: $240,300 · PhilanthropyTHE ASSOCIATED JEW…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $190,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERAT…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $257,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMM…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $163,648 · InternationalB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY INC: $65,000 · Other
    Religion$1,575,458Philanthropy$430,300Human Services$257,500International$163,648Youth Development$120,000Other$65,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $995,844 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $292,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $257,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC: $240,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $190,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $163,648 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE AMERICA MOVEMENT: $148,220 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $139,394 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Repair the World funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Repair the World. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
    • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc: 1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Repair the World’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home